since Scotillo has no apparent objection to false reports, perjured testimony (apparently the D.A's office and many others share the same opinion),
then I guess it don't matter if a medical examiner or any one for that matter, tells the truth or not.
a good example is the #1 medical examiner of Drew Peterson's dead wife.
So what's the point of law and order?
I'm saying that there are so many lies and dishonesty, there is no law and order. We have to turn this around, work to make our planet a nicer and better place for all.
Judge Scotillo has no concern if a person tells the truth, if the evidence is tampered with, if false information is told to his court room.
Judge Scotillo is a dangerous man and the problem goes further, 3500 other people (judges, prosecutors, lawyers, law professors, have no concern, in the slightest)
John Scotillo orchestrates corruption in his court room. A church going, well educated, pillar of society, 2 time bar president and a corrupt judge? No matter how u look at it, he has tossed people in jail for the same crime he committed in his court room. First crooked trial for Scotillo-I doubt it, I think this is terrorism to the justice system. Scotillo is the law. Worthy of respect, don't think so.
How come, obstruction of justice, a cover up, perjury, false documents, organized crime, terrorism, bribery, is not a equal opportunity punishment crime? Written law in reality meanswhat? Ethics or a judicial cannon means nothing to a lot of people.
My lawyer (the mayors brother), knew that the Palatine cop's report was false and that the cop's testimony was perjury. My Lawyer (the mayors brother) aided in the obstruction of justice. Mayor Mullins, Mayor Tatooles, Mayor Schwnatz got my "email", along with 5,500? others.
My lawyer was a judge Scotillo's law bar president. The judge ruled his x bar president, mayors brother, incompetent. Must have been part of the game. To look look important. If the judge rules a lawyer incompetent (before the trial began), I would think, I should have the right to get a lawyer that was competent. But it don't work that way, it's all a game playedon saps like you and me.
The office of the Cook County States attorney's office (Dick Devine), prosecutor Chandra and co prosecutor Andre, new before hand, the cops testimony was perjury and the police report was false. Did they all lie and mis led the grand jury?
I hired, lawyer # 1, (x president of the judges law bar, mayors brother), lawyer # 2 (governor of the judges law bar), lawyer #3 (maybe he is not a governor?), Lawyers # 4 and 5 (to do the appeal), lawyer # 6. None of them could tell Scotillo nor the mayors brother, nor the prosecutor, nor the cop, that they have made a mockery out of the criminal justice system. Or say, they should be ashamed of them selfs. They created a "you owe me" Scotillo. BesidesAlveraz is the matriarch of the Chicago bar and Scatillo's wife the matriarch of her law bar. If the judge tells you to threw a case or your not going to practice law, I guess a sleaze ball lawyer, has to obey.
I contacted every federal judge down town, every lawprofessor in Illinois, no body cares, but me? The law has no respect for the law. The government has no respect for the government.
The cops were high on drugs during court, or plain & simple, knew there were no penalties for his criminal conduct. The appellate court praised Scotillo for praising a cop (Wenrich) that lied to his face...... who's the fool?
The cop didn't know the color of my car, the road he's on, the town he's in, higher than a kite. All the other cops went along with it. Hunter was sitting right next to him (top state DUI cop, but could not tell Wenrich was tripping out of his mind, the surveillance video should prove this (I told Tatooles, but he didn't care). The shift commander? is now the Chief of Inverness. The chief I think was the one who's kid torturedsome one, into a false confession with Alveraz, Madigan, the mayor, village council, council of the council, village manager approval, shoot, it seems with every ones approval. Authorized human right violations. Obama and Durbin, didn't say any thing, i guess it's OK with them. Does it not make them accessories to torture? Madigan and the mayor of Palatine are for sale, call it a campaign contribution or a consulting fee. Blogo talks about it and goes to jail. Like I said in a post, blago should have beenMayor of Palatine.
I think email about a cover-up and obstruction of justice adds federal crimes, to the whole mix. But then, I contacted theFBI, they don't care also.
One of the village council members emailed me and said he don't like my blogs..... not going to change a thing, but don't like my blogs, same with the manager there has been email between the manager and village council. There were a few other return communications. with in the 5,500 emails.
5 years go by, nothing changed, except more lies, false documents and perjury, if this ain't terrorism, organized crime, than what is? The Gov and his crime commission are accessories. Senator Obama nor Durbin cares, nor the 98 others. I contacted them all.
Just think, this crap, goes on every day, day in and day out, non stop. The damage to our society, our nation, the world, is incompressible. You think the village manager is clean?
I think it's important to be honest, truthful, respectful, to know right and wrong, to be kind to others, neighborly and helping others is a good thing. It seem, I'm just about the only one that thinks this way and I will keep thinking this way. Just because every one else is a crook, has no morals, dishonest, that don't mean I have to be or, the next guy.
This nonstop corruption of law, will be the death of the very society, which law is to protect. If you ask me, this is terrorism, organized crime.
What does a person do, to report a crime? Contact a cop? Contact the village council? Call the mayor? Contact theCounty states attorney? Contact a judge? Contact a federal judge? Contact the attorney general? Contact the gov? Contact a law school? Contact the senators? Contact the FBI?I CONTACTED THEM ALL and nothing. Most every thing I blog about is public information. You don't need to be a rocket scientist for the rest. A dirt bag is a dirt bag, Plain and simple.
The Palatine Police must have arrested 20,000 or more, people since my arrest. With village, prosecutors, and judicial approval of this disgraceful conduct, I wounder how many other crooked trials, perjured testimony? Just because a cop, States attorney and judge may choose to lie in court, it still don't make it right,
The nine most terrifying words in the English language are 'I'm from the government and I'm here to help'
dirt and corruption has no boundries, nobody is the winner
howdy folks
do I look like some one that could piss some one off?
Do I look like some one that would put in a water heater for a couple 85 year old widows for nothing?
Do I look like a guy that would send money to a Ukraine family so they could buy mediicine to keep the father alive? I was told, before he died, on his death bed, he cried, to thank me for keeping him alive. Told his family that Mike was a real man.
Do I look like I would drop $100 in a AAA basket?
Do I look like a guy that would send money to a Ukraine family so they could buy mediicine to keep the father alive? I was told, before he died, on his death bed, he cried, to thank me for keeping him alive. Told his family that Mike was a real man.
Give a vietnam vet a place to say?
Do I look like a guy that would lie to your face, give you a false story?
Do I look like the guy that would go to the store and get some pavement patch, to fill in a pot hole?
Do I look like I would stop a fight, some one beating another?
Do I look like a guy that would take his crew and dig up the ailing, aging, Hunt sisters sewer line, (the neighbor, had hers dug up for $9k month ealier, by some one else) for free?
Do I look like a guy that would pull over and help some one with a flat?
Do I look like a guy that if saw a dirty cop, would try to do something?
Do I look like a guy, that if I saw some body do harm to another, I would try to stop it?
Do I look like a guy that would open a drain for some one, and say, if you don't have the money, pay me, when you can?
Do I look like a guy that would do the plumbing (no charge) for a single family house, built by the habitat for a homeless?
Do I look like a guy that would reach into his pocket and pay all expenses for some one to learn, from a week end at sewer and drain expo, full of training, education, presentations, equipment, new technics
I do this stuff and more.
I am not the enemy, just a regular guy like every one else..... that appreciates common sense, respect, help your neighbors and honesty. I just happen to have, some back bone, guts and balls with piss and vinegar to match
Hi, Mike Mars here, author of these blogs. The spelling, grammar, the way I say something, may not be the best way. No body wants to help. I think you'll get a good idea what's on my mind..... I don't like people lying, to my face, behind my back, to others, under oath, in court, in church, in school, on reports. I don't like the cover up. I don't think it's a good thing.
As far as I know, these blogs are truthful. I'm not going to call a person a lier, unless I can back it up. I'm not slinging mud just to sling mud. I'm just throwing it back in their face. I did not cast the first stone, nor did I bear false witness against thy neighbor.
I think the negative aspect of my blogs are a positive aspect (when you are sick, something is wrong, you go to the doctor and get better, that, generally is a good and positive thing).
As far as I know, these blogs are truthful. I'm not going to call a person a lier, unless I can back it up. I'm not slinging mud just to sling mud. I'm just throwing it back in their face. I did not cast the first stone, nor did I bear false witness against thy neighbor.
I think the negative aspect of my blogs are a positive aspect (when you are sick, something is wrong, you go to the doctor and get better, that, generally is a good and positive thing).
We all know that if I was wrong in my accusations, I would have been arrested a long time ago. I still believe to be a target, of those corrupt, I accuse.
I still think there are honorable, good and decent lawyers, prosecutors and judges out there, trying to do their best and hold their position to a high standard.
I still think there are honorable, good and decent lawyers, prosecutors and judges out there, trying to do their best and hold their position to a high standard.
To those international blogger's, I give you a glimps (look) into main stream USA law, Illinois law, Cook County law, Chicago law and suburban law, it is not a nice picture. My trial is done and over. I paid my debt to society. I think these officer of the court should pay their debt to society also.
I have sent over 3,000 emails; law schools, lawyers, prosecutors, judges, attorney generals, mayors, governors, senators and the president of the USA, to churches, businesses, to main stream.
No one seems to wants to take responsibility for the criminal conduct of a dirty cop, dirty lawyer, dirty prosecutor, dirty judge. Just leave it alone and let this unlawful conduct continue.
Turn a blind eye? A crime against humanity.
I think some of the people I have notified, have the power to do something, those that don't are now accessories, to a conspiracy, aiding and abetting and are criminals them self's.
I have sent over 3,000 emails; law schools, lawyers, prosecutors, judges, attorney generals, mayors, governors, senators and the president of the USA, to churches, businesses, to main stream.
No one seems to wants to take responsibility for the criminal conduct of a dirty cop, dirty lawyer, dirty prosecutor, dirty judge. Just leave it alone and let this unlawful conduct continue.
Turn a blind eye? A crime against humanity.
I think some of the people I have notified, have the power to do something, those that don't are now accessories, to a conspiracy, aiding and abetting and are criminals them self's.
Who I sent copys of this blog to? ........ 3,500 or so, diffrent people
- NWSBA
- Loyola University Chicago school of law
- US court northern district of ILL
- Kent school of law
- University of Chicago law school
- Univers of Illinois college of law
- John Marshall law school
- DePaul University college of law
- Northwestern Law University
- Illinois Judges Association
- Southern Illinois Law University
The Third Commandment reads:
Exodus 20:07 Thou shalt not take the name of the lord thy god in vain ...... when you put your hand on a bible, to who's name are you pledging the truth?
The Eighth Commandment reads:
Exodus 20:15 Thou shalt not steal ..... my liberty, justice freedom, pursuit of happiness a fair trial
The Ninth Commandment reads:
Exodus 20:16 Thou shalt not bear false witness against thy neighbor ..... lie like a rug
Exodus 20:07 Thou shalt not take the name of the lord thy god in vain ...... when you put your hand on a bible, to who's name are you pledging the truth?
The Eighth Commandment reads:
Exodus 20:15 Thou shalt not steal ..... my liberty, justice freedom, pursuit of happiness a fair trial
The Ninth Commandment reads:
Exodus 20:16 Thou shalt not bear false witness against thy neighbor ..... lie like a rug
Exodus 23:1 Thou shalt not raise a false report: put not thine hand with the wicked to be an unrighteous witness.
Deuteronomy 5:20 Neither shalt thou bear false witness against thy neighbor.
It don't matter what religion you belong to, they all have the basic same concept of right and wrong.
I try to make the selfish corrupt word around me better
The American government does not follow it's own laws, so why does the USA wants to shove this, American style corruption down the worlds throat, to me, it don't make sense. Why would the world want our style corruption, when they got their own?
case # 04-C3-30337
As far as I can tell
As long as one member of the conspiracy continues the crime, all are held accountable and there is no statue of limitations.
Palatine cop Wenrich without a question kept this door open, assistant states attorney's Chandra, Andre, judge Scotillo, defense lawyers Tatooles, Breslen, Glasgo, #4 and others maybe, don't matter. One crooked Palatine cop is all you need. You got other judges, before and after my trial have ruled Wenrich testimony is false......maybe 20,000 times, naturally with the assistant states attorney's as witness.
Million dollar question.......... who is the fool?
As long as one member of the conspiracy continues the crime, all are held accountable and there is no statue of limitations.
Palatine cop Wenrich without a question kept this door open, assistant states attorney's Chandra, Andre, judge Scotillo, defense lawyers Tatooles, Breslen, Glasgo, #4 and others maybe, don't matter. One crooked Palatine cop is all you need. You got other judges, before and after my trial have ruled Wenrich testimony is false......maybe 20,000 times, naturally with the assistant states attorney's as witness.
Million dollar question.......... who is the fool?
past president of the NorthWest Suburban Bar association
The judges wife was the publisher, Glasgo is a board member. Chandra is what?
I want criminal charges filed against the following and or I want to make a citizen arrest
- case reviewed by lawyer Jack Foreman (chicago law library)
- case reviewed by lawyer Joe Fagen
- case reviewed by lawyer Ernerst Blomquist
- case reviewed by lawyer John Clarke & Assoc
- case reviewed by lawyer Richard Cohen
- Palatine fire dept
- Palatine village council Dan Varroney
- Palatine village council Brad Helms
- Palatine village council Mike Jexierski
- Palatine village council Jack Wagner
- Palatine village council Greg Solberg
- Palatine mayor Rita Mullins
- Inverness Mayor John Tatooles
- appellate judge JJ
- appellate judge Tully
- appellate judge PJ
- appellate judge McNulty
- appellate judge O'malley
- defense lawyer #1 Tatooles
- defense lawyer #2 Glasgow
- defence lawyer #3 Breslin
- defense lawer #4
- Palatine rooky on assist of arrest
- Palatine cop Hunter star 185
- Palatine cop Mark Wenrich star 125
- Palatine shift commander
- Palatine Police chief
- assistant state's attorney Chandra
- assistant states attorney Andre
- Cook county prosecuter Devine
- associate judge John J Scotillo
- apellatte court 1st district of cook county
- retired supreme court justice (see lawyer #3) or I'll get the identity, but I will make sure he reads this
Who am I
Ask any;
Palatine cop
Palatine fireman
Palatine inspector
Palatine Historical society
Palatine park district
Palatine public works
Every plumber in town
Every business up and down Colfax, couple large hand full of business on 14
Most every restaurant owner, couple dozen apartment owners, ½ the churches in town,
Hundred or so other business owners, a couple thousand of palatine residential customers,
If that’s not enough move east, west and around. Been doing plumbing around town all my life.
Labels
- additional contacts (1)
- alvarez (2)
- appellate praised cop perjury (1)
- blago (2)
- broke (1)
- burke (2)
- cannon (2)
- case law (1)
- email (1)
- exculpatory evidence (1)
- fractual (1)
- God's test (1)
- hostage 3 yrs (1)
- immigration (2)
- innocent? (1)
- judge holderman (1)
- judge Sullivan (1)
- just another crook (1)
- lisa madigan (2)
- lunatic judge (1)
- Mike Mars (1)
- my blogs (1)
- new twist (1)
- pads (2)
- post sign 1 (1)
- post sign 2 (1)
- rico (2)
- scotillo (8)
- scotillo a crook (1)
- scotillo a disgrace (5)
- scotillo aid and abet (1)
- scotillo praises perjury (1)
- scotillo self praise (1)
- sotomayor (1)
- wenrich (6)
case number 04 C3 30337
Mike Mars
mikemarss@gmail.com
the cover up is worse than the crime, for what? not to expose a cop high on drugs during arrest
- gov blago
- Illinois reform commission blog
- matt murphy
- judge jj
- judge o'malley
- judge mcnulty
- judge tully
- jack tatooles
- inverness police 1
- cook county probation
- palatine building department
- palatine chamber of commerce
- palatine public works
- platine fire department
- blomquist
- baker
- ILL insspector generaal
- ILL attorney general lisa madigan
- chicago fbi
- total site solutions jerks
- anita alvarez
- inverness corruption
- palatine corruption
- illinois corruption
- cook county corruption
- corruption illinois
- palatine township
- palatine fire department
- vote for palatine mayor
- comments council man helms
- comments council man lamerand
- comments council man solberg
- comments council man jezierski
- comments council man wagner
- comments council man varroney
- inverness top cop
- palatine top cop
- palatine fotolog
- chicago council of lawyers
- us court nothern dist of ILL
- Illinois state police dirt 1
- inverness mayor tatooles 1
- palatine mayor mullins 4
- palatine mayor mullins 3
- palatine mayor mullins 2
- palatine mayor mullins 1
- nwsba 2
- nwsba 1
- scotillo treason
- scotillo ethics
- scotillo 3
- scotillo 2
- judge urso
- anita alvarez
- jacob bernstein
- fred hall
- Az dirt
- comments palatine police
- palatine police dirt 5
- palatine police dirt 4
- palatine police dirt 3
- palatine police dirt 2
- palatine police dirt 1
- browns chicken
- palatine dirt 1
- palatine dirt 2
- village of palatine council
- brain finger painting
- prosecutor 2 andre
- prosecutor 1 chandra 1
- defense lawyer 3 Breslin
- defense lawyer 2 Glasgo 2
- defense lawyer 2 Glasgo 1
- defense lawyer1 Tatooles 2
- defense lawyer 1 Tatooles1
- little ole me making the fuss
- total site solutions jerks
Tatooles left - defense lawyer 1
Scotillo's boss - Chief judge Urso right
How do u fight all this corruption?
blog it, let people know, this is killing America. Lets get some good people in charge. In this case trickle down corruption has taken its toll. We need trickle up honesty.
Palatine Police officer Wenrich nor any one, can be creditable in one court room in front of 1 judge then, cross the hall to another court room, another judge, be creditable with complete opposite testimony. To make matters worse, both judges then rule creditable on opposite facts and give high praise the cop that just lied to their face.
This is non stop garbage and every day all that is good, respectful and honorable gets another kick.
Just like plumbers, there are good ones and bad ones, hard to find the good ones.
a court that praises each other for manipulation and perjury
At the end of the trial the judge Scotillo is smiling, praising all the lawyers and the lawyers are smiling and praising each other for the lies, filth and disgrace that they just got away with. This was just another day, another trial, in the court room of judge John Scotillo.
While they (at this point) stating with Judge Scotillo, Chandra, Andre, Wenrich, Hunter, Tatooles and who ever else in Inverness and Palatine knew about this case, violated every law, oath, creed, code, pledge on the face of the planet………and I guarantee quite a few people knew about this trial. But at the end, they manipulated this case and perpetrated a fraud on me………..and the society.
I thought it was a pretty sick sight……….. if u ask me.
Scotillo is guilty of but not limited to
- attorney's duty to disclose fraud upon the court
- ethical obligations
- duty to report false statements
- in post-judgement proceedings, further deception of the court
- disclosure of false statements by police
- knowledge of attorney misconduct
- willfully perpertuated the perjury by continuing the lies in the appellate court
- not admitting guilt
- not taking responsibility
- fabricatons
- not correcting what is known to be false
- misconduct
- gross dereliction of duty
- public trust
- deliberately made false findings of facts to cover up governmental corruption
- unequivocally documented corruption in my trial
- violated oath of office
- cover up
- facilating a ongoing felony
- obstruction of justice
- aiding and abetting
- accessory
- conspiracy
- allowing zealous representation of prosecution
- lack of proffesional integrity
- lack of personal conscience
- professional responsibilities
- moral judgement
- uphold integrity
- obstruct the administration of justice
- ethical obligations
defense lawyer #1 on left - head judge of court house on right
defense lawyer 2 - left
cook county states attorney - right
judge scotillo, I think should not have the power to send some one to death
It is scary that Scotillo has the power to please his fancy - Lethal injection is the state's method. However, it authorizes electrocution if lethal injection is ever held to be unconstitutional.
senator durbin - left
cook county states attorney - right
This is why we need high standards of the courts
the executioner don't care about corruption in the courts, if he don't do his job, he might be next in line
Scotillo simple trafic arrest at his best
and he is allowed to sentence some one to death?
did Scotillo put this guy in jail?
was Tatooles the defense lawer?
Palatine cop, Mark Wenrich, so high on drugs, he did not know the town, highway, location, color of car he pulled over, (right there in the report as clear as day). Wenrich's only job experience prior to being a Palatine cop was a bar bouncer, $5 will get you $50 if we all don't know the bar. Probably got a job referral, scraping drunk cops off the floor.
Hunter is sitting right next to him for 2 hours, not notice a thing?, got to be a couple of the dumbest and dangerous cops on patrol.
The Inverness chief of police Haas, then deputy chief in palatine saw no problem with this.
Police chief Bratcher saw no problem with this,
nor did the mayor Tatooles,
mayor Mullins,
2 village councils,
defense lawyer Tatooles,
Board of governors (defense lawyer # 2), NW suburban bar association,
2 assistant states attorney's (Chandra and Andre),
Judge Scotillo
his wife Nancy Scotillo (attorney and bar matriarch,
court house chief judge Urso,
appellate judges;
JJ
O'Malley
Tully
PJ
Mcnulty
Mabey Wenrich had something on Haas or Hass was higher than a kite also.
Left over drugs from the evidence room or a shake down of your local drug dealer or is there drug trafficking?
Who will investigate who?
Tatooles investigate his brother?
Wenrich investigate Hunter
Mullins investigate Tatooles
Nancy Scotillo investigate her husband,
Chandra investigate Andre,
or JJ investigate PJ
or the state police that investigated Drew Peterson's dead wife?
I'm sure Baker was not the only cop in Palatine to do a shake down.
Sounds like organized crime to me, or each criminal element with in the police departments, village board, law board, court house is going their own way?
Hunter is sitting right next to him for 2 hours, not notice a thing?, got to be a couple of the dumbest and dangerous cops on patrol.
The Inverness chief of police Haas, then deputy chief in palatine saw no problem with this.
Police chief Bratcher saw no problem with this,
nor did the mayor Tatooles,
mayor Mullins,
2 village councils,
defense lawyer Tatooles,
Board of governors (defense lawyer # 2), NW suburban bar association,
2 assistant states attorney's (Chandra and Andre),
Judge Scotillo
his wife Nancy Scotillo (attorney and bar matriarch,
court house chief judge Urso,
appellate judges;
JJ
O'Malley
Tully
PJ
Mcnulty
Mabey Wenrich had something on Haas or Hass was higher than a kite also.
Left over drugs from the evidence room or a shake down of your local drug dealer or is there drug trafficking?
Who will investigate who?
Tatooles investigate his brother?
Wenrich investigate Hunter
Mullins investigate Tatooles
Nancy Scotillo investigate her husband,
Chandra investigate Andre,
or JJ investigate PJ
or the state police that investigated Drew Peterson's dead wife?
I'm sure Baker was not the only cop in Palatine to do a shake down.
Sounds like organized crime to me, or each criminal element with in the police departments, village board, law board, court house is going their own way?
Bolingbrook Police officer Drew Petersons, 2nd wife, was murdered, her dead body was placed in the bath tub, filled up with water. Drew Peterson came home, saw wife head down in the bath tub.
No water in the lungs, 1st coroner said she drowned. 2nd coroner said no water in lungs, she was dead before head was in the water. Makes sense, how are lungs going to get filled with water without breath?
The second wife filed 12? complaints with Bolingbrook Police department.
Who helped her or the missing 3rd wife after authorities were notified?
No water in the lungs, 1st coroner said she drowned. 2nd coroner said no water in lungs, she was dead before head was in the water. Makes sense, how are lungs going to get filled with water without breath?
The second wife filed 12? complaints with Bolingbrook Police department.
Who helped her or the missing 3rd wife after authorities were notified?
Major reasons why subject matter jurisdiction is lost:
(1) No petition in the record of the case, Brown v. VanKeuren, 340 Ill. 118,122 (1930).
(2) Defective petition filed, Same case as above.
(3) Fraud committed in the procurement of jurisdiction, Fredman Brothers Furniture v. Dept. of Revenue, 109 Ill. 2d 202, 486 N.E. 2d 893(1985)
(4) Fraud upon the court, In re Village of Willowbrook, 37 Ill, App. 3d 393(1962)
(5) A judge does not follow statutory procedure, Armstrong v. Obucino, 300 Ill 140, 143 (1921)
(6) Unlawful activity of a judge, Code of Judicial Conduct.
(7) Violation of due process, Johnson v. Zerbst, 304 U.S. 458, 58 S.Ct. 1019; Pure Oil Co. v. City of Northlake, 10 Ill.2d 241, 245, 140 N.E. 2d 289 (1956); Hallberg v Goldblatt Bros., 363 Ill 25 (1936); (8) If the court exceeded it's statutory authority. Rosenstiel v. Rosenstiel, 278 F. Supp. 794 (S.D.N.Y. 1967)
(9) Any acts in violation of 11 U.S.C. 362(a),IN re Garcia, 109 B.R. 335 (N.D> Illinois, 1989).
(10) Where no justiciable issue is presented to the court through proper pleadings, Ligon v. Williams, 264 Ill. App 3d 701, 637 N.E. 2d 633 (1st Dist. 1994)
(11) Where a complaint states no cognizable cause of action against that party, Charles v. Gore, 248 Ill App. 3d 441, 618 N.E. 2d 554 (1st. Dist. 1993)
(12) Where any litigant was represented before a court by a person/law firm that is prohibited by law to practice law in that jurisdiction.
(13) When the judge is involved in a scheme of bribery (the Alemann cases, Bracey v Warden, U.S. Supreme Court No. 96-6133(June 9, 1997)
(14) Where a summons was not properly issued.
(15) Where service of process was not made pursuant to statute and Supreme Courth Rules, Janove v. Bacon, 6 Ill. 2d 245, 249, 218 N.E. 2d 706, 708 (1953)
(16) When the rules of the Circuit court are not complied with.
(17) When the local rules of the special court are not complied with. (One Where the judge does not act impartially, Bracey v. Warden, U.S. Supreme Court No. 96-6133(June 9, 1997)
(18) Where the statute is vague, People v. Williams, 638 N.E. 2d 207 (1st Dist. (1994)
(19) When proper notice is not given to all parties by the movant, Wilson v. Moore, 13 Ill. App. 3d 632, 301 N.E. 2d 39 (1st Dist. (1973)
(20) Where an order/judgment is based on a void order/judgment, Austin v. Smith, 312 F 2d 337, 343 (1962); English v. English, 72 Ill. App. 3d 736, 393 N.E. 2d 18 (1st Dist. 1979) or
(21) Where the public policy of the State of Illinois is violated, Martin-Tregona v Roderick, 29 Ill. App. 3d 553, 331 N.E. 2d 100 (1st Dist. 1975)
more requriements that were not present in my trial, by the order of Scotillo
4. Before any determination, there must be a court of complete or competent jurisdiction.
- There must be two parties with capacity to be there.
- There must be subject matter jurisdiction.
- Appearance or testimony of a competent fact witness.
accessory
An accessory is a person who assists in the commission of a crime, but who does not actually participate in the commission of the crime as a joint principal. The distinction between an accessory and a principal is a question of fact and degree:
- The principal is the one whose acts or omissions, accompanied by the relevant mens rea, are the most immediate cause of the actus reus (Latin for "guilty act").
- If two or more people are directly responsible for the actus reus, they can be charged as joint principals (see common purpose). The test to distinguish a joint principal from an accessory is whether the defendant independently contributed to causing the actus reus rather than merely giving generalised and/or limited help and encouragement.
- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Accessory_(legal_term)
Knowledge of the crime
To be convicted of an accessory charge, the accused must generally be proved to have had actual knowledge that a crime was going to be, or had been, committed. Furthermore, there must be proof that the accessory knew that his or her action, or inaction, was helping the criminals commit the crime, or evade detection, or escape. A person who unknowingly houses a person who has just committed a crime, for instance, may not be charged with an accessory offense because they did not have knowledge of the crime. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Accessory_(legal_term)
Aiding and Abetting under U.S. Law
Courts often refer to aiding and abetting as an alternate theory of liability rather than a separate crime. Under 18 U.S.C. § 2, aiding and abetting liability is available in all federal criminal prosecutions; however, the availability and extent of civil aiding and abetting liability varies from statute to statute.
Where available, aiding and abetting liability generally requires three elements: 1) an underlying violation by a principal; 2) knowledge of that violation and/or the intent to facilitate the violation; and 3) assistance to the principal in the violation.
As indicated by the Supreme Court, “In order to aid and abet another to commit a crime it is necessary that a defendant 'in some sort associate himself with the venture, that he participate in it as in something that he wishes to bring about, that he seek by his action to make it succeed.” Nye & Nissen v. United States, 336 U.S. 613, 618 (1949) quoting Judge Learned Hand in U.S. v. Peoni 100 F.2d 401, 402 (2d. Cir. 1938). http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Accomplice
Accomplice
At law, an accomplice is a person who actively participates in the commission of a crime, even though they take no part in the actual criminal offense. For example, in a bank robbery, the person who points the gun at the teller and asks for the money is guilty of armed robbery. However, anyone else directly involved in the commission of the crime, such as the lookout or the getaway car driver, is an accomplice http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Accomplice
Criminal facilitation
In some jurisdictions, criminal "facilitation" laws do not require that the primary crime be actually committed as a prerequisite for criminal liability. These include state statutes making it a crime to "provide" a person with "means or opportunity" to commit a crime, "believing it probable that he is rendering aid to a person who intends to commit a crime."[1]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Accessory_(legal_term)
Conspiracy
In some jurisdictions, a, although there are exceptions. In some situations, a charge of conspiracy can be made even if the primary offense is never committed, so long as the plan has been made, and at least one overt act towards the crime has been committed by at least one of the conspirators. Thus, an accessory before the fact will often, but not always, also be considered a conspirator. A conspirator must have been a party to the planning the crime, rather than merely becoming aware of the plan to commit it and then helping in some way.
A person who incites another to a crime will become a member of a conspiracy if agreement is reached, and may then be considered an accessory or a joint principal if the crime is eventually committed.
In the United States, a person who learns of the crime and gives some form of assistance before the crime is committed is known as an "accessory before the fact". A person who learns of the crime after it is committed and helps the criminal to conceal it, or aids the criminal in escaping, or simply fails to report the crime, is known as an "accessory after the fact". A person who does both is sometimes referred to as an "accessory before and after the fact", but this usage is less common. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Accessory_(legal_term)
United States
The U.S. criminal code makes aiding and abetting a federal crime itself a crime[1]:
- (a) Whoever aids, abets, counsels, commands, induces or procures the commission of an offense, is punishable as a principal.
- (b) Whoever willfully causes an act to be done which if directly performed by him or another would be an offense, is punishable as a principal.
A person may be convicted of aiding and abetting any act made criminal under the code. The elements of aiding and abetting are, generally:
- (1) guilty knowledge on the part of the accused ( the mens rea);
- (2) the commission of an offense by someone; and
- (3) the defendant assisted or participated in the commission of the offense (the actus reus). http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Accessory_(legal_term)
6th amendment - right to have effective attorney
The Supreme Court has determined that the Right to Counsel clause guarantees not only the right to have an attorney in a criminal proceeding, but also to have an effective attorney. This doesn't mean that the attorney has to be perfect, but that he must adequately ensure that the defendant receives a fair trial. Courts can replace attorneys if they believe it is in the best interest of the defendant. Some reasons that a court may conclude that an attorney is ineffective include lack of knowledge of judicial and legal proceedings, conflicts of interest that prevent the attorney from being fully loyal to the interests of the defendant or a breakdown of communication between the defendant and his lawyer.
http://www.revolutionary-war-and-beyond.com/right-to-counsel-clause.html
http://www.revolutionary-war-and-beyond.com/right-to-counsel-clause.html
1 - this is good enough to be a horror movie
staring Mike Mars..........I all ready emailed 1 movie star.
e1
2 - been thinking
I've been thinking, when I can afford it, go to the Rolling Meadows small claims court house and bring a civil suite against some one.
Just to ask them about Wenrich.
then............ ask some more questions?
But first, I think, send them registered or certified mail of my email.
We know exactly what will clean this up.
If I brought a $100 million dollar law suite against parties involved, causing them to take responsibility.
This would change directions.
This would force a change.
Just to ask them about Wenrich.
then............ ask some more questions?
But first, I think, send them registered or certified mail of my email.
We know exactly what will clean this up.
If I brought a $100 million dollar law suite against parties involved, causing them to take responsibility.
This would change directions.
This would force a change.
e2
3 - a few reasons why judge Scotillo belongs in jail
Many of you know, about 5 years ago I got pulled over by a Palatine cop, by the name of Mark Wenrich. Many or you know the Police report and testimony was deliberately deceitful, a lie and fraudulent. Under oath, instead of saying “I made a few mistakes in the report and that I would like to take the opportunity to correct them”, he stuck to his guns and gave premeditated, intentional perjured testimony. At the time of my arrest, this police officer was intoxicated, high on drugs or something, just following the protocol of a corrupted village or Wenrich is dumber than a stump. There were other police officers present during this arrest. Now we have a group of cops, witnessing and assisting one of its own, intoxicated, high on something, making arrest. If I was a cop, I would be a little nervous if my fraternal brother was out of his mind, running around with a gun strapped to his side.
I mentioned this and provided enough evidence to all defense attorneys to put all doubts to rest. I also told and asked Tatooles to get a copy of the video tape of the arrest and get a copy of the gps location of the police car and that will give added confirmation and verification as to lies in the report, at the arrest site, at the station. Which Tatooles didn't.
I am sad that many people who draw paychecks from the Village of Palatine and other locale government agencies, just didn’t and don’t care about integrity, professional conduct, code of ethic, truthfulness and honesty. Upon further investigation (after the fact), the corruption surrounding this case is staggering.
I was hoping during the past 5 years that, at some point in time, some one would have the balls, guts or decency to make some attempt to correct some lies that Wenrich, on duty Palatine Police cop, told of me, in a false police report and testimoney under oath in a court of law. But nobody felt it important, didn’t want to rock the boat, waist their time, get involved, did not want to give 2 cents worth of effort, lift a finger, to correct a wrong. I asked for help to write this letter, but nobody would touch this matter with a 10 foot pole. Rather the entire village would prefer to have corrupt mad men on drugs, with guns and badges, driving around town, 24 hours a day, doing what they please. (go to my palatine-dirt blog and it gets scarier). http://palatine-dirt.blogspot.com/
I could never figure out why people in the employment of the Village of Palatine and related government bodies could, would and have protected corruption. If the reason is because I have a wife and kids to support............I could be fired, this is up to you, it still don’t make it right. What are you telling your kids, (the next generation of Americans), your neighbors, your preacher, your boss, that it is OK to lie or it is OK for cops to lie, when you see a crime, just turn away, ignore it, don’t bother stopping to help some one? But then once again look at all the corruption and there is a lot of it. I have just scratched the surface (tip of the iceberg so to speak). Where is the sense of right or wrong .......... I'll tell you where it is .......... it is gone!
You cannot beat what the church has to offer; 1 hour a week, 5 bucks in the kitty and your sole gets blessed. What a bargain. Just think if we did not have this sole cleansing service every week, things might be a lot worse. So maybe, some people put 10 bucks in and get a double blessing, so they can be double crooked for the week. They all go to the same church or 2 or 3 and that's it. I've been around town for 35? years.
I have notified - emailed countless churches. This reminds me of the Drew Peterson case 30 miles away, the wife told the minister days before her disappearance that she is in fear for her life, her husband a Bollingbrook cop has threatened to kill her, that her husband confessed to her that he murdered his previous wife. This minister abandon his faith and did nothing to help. To those who do not know about this google it, Stacy Peterson has not been seen since. Drew Peterson was a Bolingbrook cop for 23 years. During this time he had fellow cops, prosecutors and judges praise the day he was born. This was another case where State of Illinois police, Bolingbrook police, DuPage county states, assistance states attorneys lied, covered up his and all related crimes to Peterson, still go un punished and Stacy is missing in action.
My defense team started with James Tatooles (lawyer number 1) (the brother of the mayor of Inverness John Tatooles, (very small neighboring community that recently purchased its first police car). I pointed out to Tatooles and others (now I blog and tell the world), that some entries in the police report were way off wall, knowingly false and that it makes one wonder what this cop was on, when he made the arrest.
One particular observation and entry in the police report was a “mother of all, of his bumbling observations or lack of, or what he hallucinated to”. I don’t see how a cop in their right mind would make such a entry, unless, cops knows they have judges and prosecutors in their pocket and can twist em as they please.
Wenrich did not know the color of the car he was following / pulled over.
Besides the fact, that Wenrich did not know which side of the road he pulled the car over (tow ticket).
Besides the fact, that Wenrich did not know the direction he or I were traveling.
Wenrich did not know what road he pulled me over on.
Yes, in America and the courts have no problem with this!
Officer Wenrich said “ Rand North of Hicks. The posted speed limit for that stretch of road is 40 mph”. When in fact Rand North of Hicks, had 2 posted speed limit signs for that stretch of road that read 35 mph. Actually Rand has a Northwest or Southeast direction. So there for, he did not know exactly, sort of, maybe, kind of, or where about, he pulled me over. Maybe Wenrich meant Rand South of Hicks, or Hicks North of Rand or Hicks South of Rand.
I simply don’t know what Wenrich was on.
I would think that the states attorney could not allow this report or testimony in a court of law.
Tatooles might have realized that there is a severe problem with Mark Wenrich’s report, which could possibly point to a Wenrich’s on the job intoxication or something, at the time of the arrest, which would be a dui, for a cop who issued a dui, which might open the doors as to the other state of minds of the officers involved in the arrest, which might open the door as to where was the shift commander during this, and open the door as to the competence of the deputy police chief and police chief (as to not knowing what is going on), then that might open the door as to why the village council are keeping these people on the city payroll which might bring to attention other shady activities that village members do not want known.
Mr. Tatooles as a member and past president of the Northwest Suburban Bar Association, officer of the court, is required to have this police officer arrested for making a false police report and if testimony would follow, he is obligated to add addition felony charges for perjured testimony.
I'll tell you one thing ... if any of us make a false police report, we're in big trouble, testify, bigger trouble.
I mentioned this and provided enough evidence to all defense attorneys to put all doubts to rest. I also told and asked Tatooles to get a copy of the video tape of the arrest and get a copy of the gps location of the police car and that will give added confirmation and verification as to lies in the report, at the arrest site, at the station. Which Tatooles didn't.
I am sad that many people who draw paychecks from the Village of Palatine and other locale government agencies, just didn’t and don’t care about integrity, professional conduct, code of ethic, truthfulness and honesty. Upon further investigation (after the fact), the corruption surrounding this case is staggering.
I was hoping during the past 5 years that, at some point in time, some one would have the balls, guts or decency to make some attempt to correct some lies that Wenrich, on duty Palatine Police cop, told of me, in a false police report and testimoney under oath in a court of law. But nobody felt it important, didn’t want to rock the boat, waist their time, get involved, did not want to give 2 cents worth of effort, lift a finger, to correct a wrong. I asked for help to write this letter, but nobody would touch this matter with a 10 foot pole. Rather the entire village would prefer to have corrupt mad men on drugs, with guns and badges, driving around town, 24 hours a day, doing what they please. (go to my palatine-dirt blog and it gets scarier). http://palatine-dirt.blogspot.com/
I could never figure out why people in the employment of the Village of Palatine and related government bodies could, would and have protected corruption. If the reason is because I have a wife and kids to support............I could be fired, this is up to you, it still don’t make it right. What are you telling your kids, (the next generation of Americans), your neighbors, your preacher, your boss, that it is OK to lie or it is OK for cops to lie, when you see a crime, just turn away, ignore it, don’t bother stopping to help some one? But then once again look at all the corruption and there is a lot of it. I have just scratched the surface (tip of the iceberg so to speak). Where is the sense of right or wrong .......... I'll tell you where it is .......... it is gone!
You cannot beat what the church has to offer; 1 hour a week, 5 bucks in the kitty and your sole gets blessed. What a bargain. Just think if we did not have this sole cleansing service every week, things might be a lot worse. So maybe, some people put 10 bucks in and get a double blessing, so they can be double crooked for the week. They all go to the same church or 2 or 3 and that's it. I've been around town for 35? years.
I have notified - emailed countless churches. This reminds me of the Drew Peterson case 30 miles away, the wife told the minister days before her disappearance that she is in fear for her life, her husband a Bollingbrook cop has threatened to kill her, that her husband confessed to her that he murdered his previous wife. This minister abandon his faith and did nothing to help. To those who do not know about this google it, Stacy Peterson has not been seen since. Drew Peterson was a Bolingbrook cop for 23 years. During this time he had fellow cops, prosecutors and judges praise the day he was born. This was another case where State of Illinois police, Bolingbrook police, DuPage county states, assistance states attorneys lied, covered up his and all related crimes to Peterson, still go un punished and Stacy is missing in action.
My defense team started with James Tatooles (lawyer number 1) (the brother of the mayor of Inverness John Tatooles, (very small neighboring community that recently purchased its first police car). I pointed out to Tatooles and others (now I blog and tell the world), that some entries in the police report were way off wall, knowingly false and that it makes one wonder what this cop was on, when he made the arrest.
One particular observation and entry in the police report was a “mother of all, of his bumbling observations or lack of, or what he hallucinated to”. I don’t see how a cop in their right mind would make such a entry, unless, cops knows they have judges and prosecutors in their pocket and can twist em as they please.
Wenrich did not know the color of the car he was following / pulled over.
Besides the fact, that Wenrich did not know which side of the road he pulled the car over (tow ticket).
Besides the fact, that Wenrich did not know the direction he or I were traveling.
Wenrich did not know what road he pulled me over on.
Yes, in America and the courts have no problem with this!
Officer Wenrich said “ Rand North of Hicks. The posted speed limit for that stretch of road is 40 mph”. When in fact Rand North of Hicks, had 2 posted speed limit signs for that stretch of road that read 35 mph. Actually Rand has a Northwest or Southeast direction. So there for, he did not know exactly, sort of, maybe, kind of, or where about, he pulled me over. Maybe Wenrich meant Rand South of Hicks, or Hicks North of Rand or Hicks South of Rand.
I simply don’t know what Wenrich was on.
I would think that the states attorney could not allow this report or testimony in a court of law.
Tatooles might have realized that there is a severe problem with Mark Wenrich’s report, which could possibly point to a Wenrich’s on the job intoxication or something, at the time of the arrest, which would be a dui, for a cop who issued a dui, which might open the doors as to the other state of minds of the officers involved in the arrest, which might open the door as to where was the shift commander during this, and open the door as to the competence of the deputy police chief and police chief (as to not knowing what is going on), then that might open the door as to why the village council are keeping these people on the city payroll which might bring to attention other shady activities that village members do not want known.
Mr. Tatooles as a member and past president of the Northwest Suburban Bar Association, officer of the court, is required to have this police officer arrested for making a false police report and if testimony would follow, he is obligated to add addition felony charges for perjured testimony.
I'll tell you one thing ... if any of us make a false police report, we're in big trouble, testify, bigger trouble.
e3
4 - nobody in the village cared
Wenrich's lie, is in such fashion, it effects just about every ticket, report, testimoney he has been apart of.
On the surface I think that every right that you would think a person is entitled was not granted me, code of ethics, and professional conduct are absent, you name it, it was not here.
But under the surface, this behavior has become the standard and acceptable practice. This case is so corrupt, from every concept, from start to end.
All I wanted is the truth told in my case. I sent this to Hollywood, this would make a good movie. I think this would be a good review in law school as a discussion on reality for future lawyers, politicians and judges.
People in the police and fire departments, building departments. Public works, Township departments, historical society, the park and school districts, and some people who work at the library seem to think I should be lucky I did not go to jail, Many businesses people, in town, out of town, residents, are aware of my case. But go to church every week for a hour, toss in 5 bucks, you get the sole cleansed and they hope this does not happen to them
On the surface I think that every right that you would think a person is entitled was not granted me, code of ethics, and professional conduct are absent, you name it, it was not here.
But under the surface, this behavior has become the standard and acceptable practice. This case is so corrupt, from every concept, from start to end.
All I wanted is the truth told in my case. I sent this to Hollywood, this would make a good movie. I think this would be a good review in law school as a discussion on reality for future lawyers, politicians and judges.
People in the police and fire departments, building departments. Public works, Township departments, historical society, the park and school districts, and some people who work at the library seem to think I should be lucky I did not go to jail, Many businesses people, in town, out of town, residents, are aware of my case. But go to church every week for a hour, toss in 5 bucks, you get the sole cleansed and they hope this does not happen to them
e4
5 - I suspect
James Tatooles, knowing about the gravity of the situation, and that his brother John is the Mayor of the next town (Inverness), which relies on Palatine Police, Fire and public works departments for 24 hour service, might have asked his brother for his thoughts on the matter.
In which John Tatooles, might have talked to his village board and or maybe talked to the mayor of Palatine Rita Mullins, who may have talked to her village board about this issue.
The Palatine police has been know for problems in the past and there might be some ill feelings with the Palatine Police, Fire and public works departments, not with standing the Palatine Park District if any thing might rock the boat again, especially the brother of the mayor of Inverness.
Past president of the Northwest Suburban Bar Association, one of the largest Bar Association in Illinois, commanded the obedience and loyalty of his fellow brothers-in-law, which include, politicians, attorneys, judges and prosecutors. As it turned out, after the trial, James Tatooles has made a run for judgeship. Having the endorsement of many prestigious groups. After failure of that venture, he is now trying for republican state representative.
I really don't think any prestigious group would endorse the actions i describe.
Once again, not until further investigation, facts reveal, the extent of massive corruption between the 2 cities and their inter action with various departments. No one could get a fair trial with this corruption in place
In which John Tatooles, might have talked to his village board and or maybe talked to the mayor of Palatine Rita Mullins, who may have talked to her village board about this issue.
The Palatine police has been know for problems in the past and there might be some ill feelings with the Palatine Police, Fire and public works departments, not with standing the Palatine Park District if any thing might rock the boat again, especially the brother of the mayor of Inverness.
Past president of the Northwest Suburban Bar Association, one of the largest Bar Association in Illinois, commanded the obedience and loyalty of his fellow brothers-in-law, which include, politicians, attorneys, judges and prosecutors. As it turned out, after the trial, James Tatooles has made a run for judgeship. Having the endorsement of many prestigious groups. After failure of that venture, he is now trying for republican state representative.
I really don't think any prestigious group would endorse the actions i describe.
Once again, not until further investigation, facts reveal, the extent of massive corruption between the 2 cities and their inter action with various departments. No one could get a fair trial with this corruption in place
e5
6 - let's have fun
So I think the stage was then set------------------------------
The jest of the private pretrial conference in the Judge Scotillo’s chambers with assistant state’s attorney Shari Chandra and Michael Andre and James Tatooles went something like this, please note, I am assuming that the judge was present and that Tatooles discussed the evidence (that is what lawyers are suppose to do);
Note, that through investigations by me, after the fact (after I am no longer the property of scotillo) this original, “so I think the stage was set” should be slightly different. It was not like they did not know each other, very much the opposite (look at the other blogs and you will see what I mean). But for now, I will stick with this scene.
Hi judge, we have a problem, the police officer at the time of arrest, has a sobriety issue or just to dumb to be a cop. Other officers, assisting the arrest, would question their sobriety. Look at the police report.
Wenrich not knowing the correct color of the car he was following & pulled over.
the fact Wenrich did not know which side of the road he pulled the my clients car over on,
nor did Wenrich know what road he was on during the pursuit and arrest of my client.
Wenrich says it was Rand, but what is worst, Wenrich’s report says that “The posted speed limit for that stretch of road is 40 miles per hour”. There is no posted 40 mile per hour speed limit for that stretch of Rand. Your honor, Wenrich has written thousands of speeding tickets on that stretch of Rand saying that the posted speed limit is 35 miles per hour. Here judge look at these photos.
The assistant states attorney Shari Chandra and Michael Andre, then agreed and added Tatooles is right, Wenrich’s report and testimony would be in direct contradiction to previous testimony and judicial rulings in this court house and maybe by you also.
The IDOT, the Cook County State attorneys office, fellow Judges have established that Wenrich’s observations, report is false and testimony would be false.
We, the Cook County Assistant State's attorneys have witnessed Wenrich under sworn testimony say contrary to these facts.
We have no idea where or what was on his mind at the time of arrest. Also as a matter of fact judge, you have probably ruled as a fact, in a previous case or 2 in which the testimony of that stretch of road was established, by you, as 35 miles per hour, so any ruling on this police report or testimony, will contradict and not support your own previous rulings. We would put Wenrich the arresting officer, in further jeopardy, than he is now.
Tatooles also might have said, If I have to argue about the breath test, my client was exposed to and breathing acetone and keyatone all day, PVC glue and primer and had open cans next to him at the time of the arrest. A expert witness will cancel out breath test.
Shari Chandra said something like darn, I am looking forward to my first trial and to start with a winner would be a good thing.
Then Tatooles’s added, there is another problem, as you know your honor, my brother is the Mayor Inverness, and is concerned about the friction that this may cause and there is the point of a conflict of interest.
Maybe Scotillo was not present in the pre trial hearing. Maybe the Assistant State’s Attorney Chandra and Andre and Tatooles planed this all on their own, but let’s assume Scotillo was present (who else could order 4 defense lawyers, and the entire States Attorney’s office of Cook County with 2 prosecuting attorneys, a police departments, who ever else might pop in to violate the law
As it turns out a retired supreme court justice called me after the trial, (I let more than a few people know of my story and that I will no longer be available or next to impossible, for plumbing work on their properties. Let my customers know of my problems so they might as find another plumber..... one of my customers just happen to hob knobs with supreme court justices.
I assume Judge Scotillo was present in the pre trail hearing, took charge.
“Ok, now Shari, watch and learn, this is how we play these games, don’t forget I am the judge, I am the law, if you want to practice law, in this state, you better keep your mouth shut ears open or your law degree wont be worth the paper it was printed on".
There will be no talk of any sort of, miss conduct, a cover up, tampering with evidence, a false police report, conspiracy, deception, or a intoxicated cop during this arrest. Nobody needs to know this. Just keep it from the court recorders ears, and if there is a problem, I will turn off the mic, hahahhahaha. (re; American hero - Stan Meyer's and his water powered fuel cells. A judge had the mic off only during the defense testimony, so on appeal there was no transcripts, there for lost his defense... another crooked judge)
We will not mention anything about this exculpatory evidence in trial, keep it away from the court recorder ears, that way all of this nonsense is nothing, nobodies the wiser.
I will sentence him so that by the time he gets out of the courts control, the statue of limitations would have reached its limit on all matters. If he complains before then, I will sight him with contempt and throw his ass in jail till he rots.
(However, I think that both criminal and civil conspiracy is valid, simply for one reason (but not limited to), the fact that Palatine police (and or Wenrich) and the Cook County States Attorneys office (and or Shari, Michael) have subsequently prosecuted traffic tickets that the posted speed limit sign is 35 miles per hour. The lie is still active, forver with no time limit, as long as 1 member of the conspiracy continues the act.
“Shari can get her first win and another feather in Michael’s cap”
“Jim, your brother wont have to worry, I see no conflict of interest”,
“Shari, make sure the cop knows he is off the hook, every thing is OK and have him, just stick to the report, Tatooles will not bring any of this up, if he does, I’ll stop him before he gets there”
“Jim are you ready for trial? There was no grand jury which was good, get Mars to wave a trail by jury, which will be even better yet, and since we are going this route, this will be a walk in the park done by lunch”.
Then I suspect Scotillo would have asked Tatooles “You paid up? Tatooles said “yep”.
“Jim, since your going to run for Judge, you don’t need to bash a cop, not with this case, to close to home, to close for your brother, you don’t need mothers against drunk drivers knocking on your door".
You can make some frivolous arguments about not being prepared, the field sobriety test or something. Since you don’t have a expert witness present to contradict the breath test, just don’t bring up the presents of the chemicals that would trigger a false reading on the breath analyzer, that, your client was exposed to that day and up the time of arrest. Put your client on the stand, don’t prep him and then we will let Shari have fun ripping him apart. I will make sure on your examination of the Wenrich you don’t go where we don’t want to go”.
Then the judge said “so there, lets go, get this over with and have some fun”
The jest of the private pretrial conference in the Judge Scotillo’s chambers with assistant state’s attorney Shari Chandra and Michael Andre and James Tatooles went something like this, please note, I am assuming that the judge was present and that Tatooles discussed the evidence (that is what lawyers are suppose to do);
Note, that through investigations by me, after the fact (after I am no longer the property of scotillo) this original, “so I think the stage was set” should be slightly different. It was not like they did not know each other, very much the opposite (look at the other blogs and you will see what I mean). But for now, I will stick with this scene.
Hi judge, we have a problem, the police officer at the time of arrest, has a sobriety issue or just to dumb to be a cop. Other officers, assisting the arrest, would question their sobriety. Look at the police report.
Wenrich not knowing the correct color of the car he was following & pulled over.
the fact Wenrich did not know which side of the road he pulled the my clients car over on,
nor did Wenrich know what road he was on during the pursuit and arrest of my client.
Wenrich says it was Rand, but what is worst, Wenrich’s report says that “The posted speed limit for that stretch of road is 40 miles per hour”. There is no posted 40 mile per hour speed limit for that stretch of Rand. Your honor, Wenrich has written thousands of speeding tickets on that stretch of Rand saying that the posted speed limit is 35 miles per hour. Here judge look at these photos.
The assistant states attorney Shari Chandra and Michael Andre, then agreed and added Tatooles is right, Wenrich’s report and testimony would be in direct contradiction to previous testimony and judicial rulings in this court house and maybe by you also.
The IDOT, the Cook County State attorneys office, fellow Judges have established that Wenrich’s observations, report is false and testimony would be false.
We, the Cook County Assistant State's attorneys have witnessed Wenrich under sworn testimony say contrary to these facts.
We have no idea where or what was on his mind at the time of arrest. Also as a matter of fact judge, you have probably ruled as a fact, in a previous case or 2 in which the testimony of that stretch of road was established, by you, as 35 miles per hour, so any ruling on this police report or testimony, will contradict and not support your own previous rulings. We would put Wenrich the arresting officer, in further jeopardy, than he is now.
Tatooles also might have said, If I have to argue about the breath test, my client was exposed to and breathing acetone and keyatone all day, PVC glue and primer and had open cans next to him at the time of the arrest. A expert witness will cancel out breath test.
Shari Chandra said something like darn, I am looking forward to my first trial and to start with a winner would be a good thing.
Then Tatooles’s added, there is another problem, as you know your honor, my brother is the Mayor Inverness, and is concerned about the friction that this may cause and there is the point of a conflict of interest.
Maybe Scotillo was not present in the pre trial hearing. Maybe the Assistant State’s Attorney Chandra and Andre and Tatooles planed this all on their own, but let’s assume Scotillo was present (who else could order 4 defense lawyers, and the entire States Attorney’s office of Cook County with 2 prosecuting attorneys, a police departments, who ever else might pop in to violate the law
As it turns out a retired supreme court justice called me after the trial, (I let more than a few people know of my story and that I will no longer be available or next to impossible, for plumbing work on their properties. Let my customers know of my problems so they might as find another plumber..... one of my customers just happen to hob knobs with supreme court justices.
I assume Judge Scotillo was present in the pre trail hearing, took charge.
“Ok, now Shari, watch and learn, this is how we play these games, don’t forget I am the judge, I am the law, if you want to practice law, in this state, you better keep your mouth shut ears open or your law degree wont be worth the paper it was printed on".
There will be no talk of any sort of, miss conduct, a cover up, tampering with evidence, a false police report, conspiracy, deception, or a intoxicated cop during this arrest. Nobody needs to know this. Just keep it from the court recorders ears, and if there is a problem, I will turn off the mic, hahahhahaha. (re; American hero - Stan Meyer's and his water powered fuel cells. A judge had the mic off only during the defense testimony, so on appeal there was no transcripts, there for lost his defense... another crooked judge)
We will not mention anything about this exculpatory evidence in trial, keep it away from the court recorder ears, that way all of this nonsense is nothing, nobodies the wiser.
I will sentence him so that by the time he gets out of the courts control, the statue of limitations would have reached its limit on all matters. If he complains before then, I will sight him with contempt and throw his ass in jail till he rots.
(However, I think that both criminal and civil conspiracy is valid, simply for one reason (but not limited to), the fact that Palatine police (and or Wenrich) and the Cook County States Attorneys office (and or Shari, Michael) have subsequently prosecuted traffic tickets that the posted speed limit sign is 35 miles per hour. The lie is still active, forver with no time limit, as long as 1 member of the conspiracy continues the act.
“Shari can get her first win and another feather in Michael’s cap”
“Jim, your brother wont have to worry, I see no conflict of interest”,
“Shari, make sure the cop knows he is off the hook, every thing is OK and have him, just stick to the report, Tatooles will not bring any of this up, if he does, I’ll stop him before he gets there”
“Jim are you ready for trial? There was no grand jury which was good, get Mars to wave a trail by jury, which will be even better yet, and since we are going this route, this will be a walk in the park done by lunch”.
Then I suspect Scotillo would have asked Tatooles “You paid up? Tatooles said “yep”.
“Jim, since your going to run for Judge, you don’t need to bash a cop, not with this case, to close to home, to close for your brother, you don’t need mothers against drunk drivers knocking on your door".
You can make some frivolous arguments about not being prepared, the field sobriety test or something. Since you don’t have a expert witness present to contradict the breath test, just don’t bring up the presents of the chemicals that would trigger a false reading on the breath analyzer, that, your client was exposed to that day and up the time of arrest. Put your client on the stand, don’t prep him and then we will let Shari have fun ripping him apart. I will make sure on your examination of the Wenrich you don’t go where we don’t want to go”.
Then the judge said “so there, lets go, get this over with and have some fun”
e6
7 - the trial
During the trial, the only thing I could get Tatooles to say or that he was scripted not to say, was that Wenrich got the color of the car wrong. After Tatooles examination was over with Wenrich, I was going to say stop, I have a few questions, but I just wanted to see how this game that was being played , was going to be play out.
We broke for lunch, he went out to his car, called me after lunch to testify (no warning, no prep, no expert witness, no nothing)
So at the end of trial I was guilty and every one praised them self’s of such a out standing job. It was like a club with in the court room and it was the end of days hunt.
We broke for lunch, he went out to his car, called me after lunch to testify (no warning, no prep, no expert witness, no nothing)
So at the end of trial I was guilty and every one praised them self’s of such a out standing job. It was like a club with in the court room and it was the end of days hunt.
e7
Illinois method of execution
Lethal Injection - Execution by lethal injection is the most common method used to put condemned inmates to death today. It is achieved by the intravenous delivery of a deadly quantity of three different drugs. The inmate is placed on a gurney and his ankles and wrists are restrained. A regular saline IV line is started in both arms. Upon the signal of the warden, a large dose of sodium thiopental (a common hospital anesthetic) is delivered, causing unconsciousness. This is followed by pancuronium bromide, which is a muscle-relaxer which paralyzes the lungs and diaphragm. This causes the inmate's respiration to slow significantly. Finally, potassium chloride is introduced into the IV, which causes a fatal cardiac arrest. Death usually occurs approximately 7 minutes after the lethal injection begins. According to the Texas Department of Criminal Justice, the cost for the drugs used in lethal injection is $86.08.
Lethal injection is the state's method. However, it authorizes electrocution if lethal injection is ever held to be unconstitutional.
Lethal injection is the state's method. However, it authorizes electrocution if lethal injection is ever held to be unconstitutional.
8 - post trial arguments
I had trial transcripts made. I paid about a dozen lawyers close to $25,000.00 for a review of the trial. Some attorney’s saw major problems with the trial, others were apparently in the same bar association (club) of Jim Tatooles (past president), the judge and wife (editor and publisher of news letter) or were concerned about intimidation from the judge, so they praised actions of the court and said there is nothing they can do.
I hired attorney number 2 (Thomas Glasgo). $2,500 to look at the transcripts and another $5,000.00 to argue some post trial views that I thought were important and missed. Such as but not limited to; accessory, facilitating perjury, conspiracy, obstruction of justice, a lack of truth. letting him know about a cover up, fabrications, gross dereliction of duty, willfully perpetuated a perjury, subverted testimony, attorney and judicial misconduct hoping he would correct the errors that made a dirty cop go free. He argued about this and that, but not about my main concern.
Some place, some how lawyer number 2 must have become informed of what the game plan is and he fell in place or Scotillo would make sure he would never practice law again. So lawyer number 2, also decided to knowingly and willfully aided and abetted and furthered the obstruction of justice.
I am sure this action gave Scotillo, Chandra Andres and Tatooles a little kick, because this was not apart of the original game plan. But I am sure Scotillo was pleased that another lawyer without a backbone would submit to his will.
I was teary eyed in my last statement, knowing that the entire justice system failed, corruption prevail and I was just a piece of trash. Why was I the only one that wanted the truth to be told. I was not getting a fair trial and nobody cared.
I paid another two lawyers for a appeal (lawyer number 3(Warren Breslin) and lawyer number 4), hoping one last chance some one could tell a judge that, there is major corruption in my trial. I was still not sure what power prevented a simple truth from come out.
One day I got a call from one of my customers, he was pretty choked up also. (I let my grievance to known to a lot of people, friends, other plumbers, inspectors, some guys in the Chicago and County and Springfield governments, lets not forget about the MWRSD and customers, letting the customers know that most likely they will have to find another plumber, I won’t be doing plumbing for a while). He said he had a friend that, will be calling me, a retired supreme court judge.
He called, asked me a bunch of questions, didn’t know the answers. To me it was just another voice on the other end of the line, so I said I will have lawyer number 3, get back with him. Lawyer number 3 was very impressed, little ole me have such contact ability. I did not want to contact another friend of mine, a retired appellate court judge for help. He had a stroke, long time ago, can read, limited vocabulary. I hope and maybe he is much better these years, I just didn’t want to go over to the house and bother him and his wife with this non sense. I can stand on my own 2 feet. I thought and always will think that Sheldon's OK.
Lawyer number 3 talked to the retired supreme court judge. Lawyer number 3 was the contact person for lawyer number 4, who wrote the appeal. Because lawyer number 3 was witness to much of the court room proceedings, and because his neighbor happens to be the other associate judge at the Rolling Meadows court house. Breslin was probably was advised to make sure the appeal was frivolous, worthless, a no nothing appeal that will go no place, mean nothing to anybody. So that was a waste of another $9,000 or so. What are you going to do if a judge tells a lawyer play ball, my ball or else, I will make sure you will never practice law again.
This was just 2 more lawyers with no balls or guts, willfully, knowingly aided in a cover up, a successful cover up. Now we have;
* Scotillo,
* Tatooles (lawyer number1), his brother? with or without his trustees?
* Assistant State’s attorney Chandra & Andre (agents of Cook County State’s Attorney Richard Devine)
* Cook County State’s attorney’s office of Richard Devine
* Mark Wenrich of the Palatine Police Department, and his fellow brothers in various departments, public works, township agencies and districts, the mayor and her village trustees.
* Lawyer number 2, 3 and 4 and possible a retired supreme court justice now all on board
I hired attorney number 2 (Thomas Glasgo). $2,500 to look at the transcripts and another $5,000.00 to argue some post trial views that I thought were important and missed. Such as but not limited to; accessory, facilitating perjury, conspiracy, obstruction of justice, a lack of truth. letting him know about a cover up, fabrications, gross dereliction of duty, willfully perpetuated a perjury, subverted testimony, attorney and judicial misconduct hoping he would correct the errors that made a dirty cop go free. He argued about this and that, but not about my main concern.
Some place, some how lawyer number 2 must have become informed of what the game plan is and he fell in place or Scotillo would make sure he would never practice law again. So lawyer number 2, also decided to knowingly and willfully aided and abetted and furthered the obstruction of justice.
I am sure this action gave Scotillo, Chandra Andres and Tatooles a little kick, because this was not apart of the original game plan. But I am sure Scotillo was pleased that another lawyer without a backbone would submit to his will.
I was teary eyed in my last statement, knowing that the entire justice system failed, corruption prevail and I was just a piece of trash. Why was I the only one that wanted the truth to be told. I was not getting a fair trial and nobody cared.
I paid another two lawyers for a appeal (lawyer number 3(Warren Breslin) and lawyer number 4), hoping one last chance some one could tell a judge that, there is major corruption in my trial. I was still not sure what power prevented a simple truth from come out.
One day I got a call from one of my customers, he was pretty choked up also. (I let my grievance to known to a lot of people, friends, other plumbers, inspectors, some guys in the Chicago and County and Springfield governments, lets not forget about the MWRSD and customers, letting the customers know that most likely they will have to find another plumber, I won’t be doing plumbing for a while). He said he had a friend that, will be calling me, a retired supreme court judge.
He called, asked me a bunch of questions, didn’t know the answers. To me it was just another voice on the other end of the line, so I said I will have lawyer number 3, get back with him. Lawyer number 3 was very impressed, little ole me have such contact ability. I did not want to contact another friend of mine, a retired appellate court judge for help. He had a stroke, long time ago, can read, limited vocabulary. I hope and maybe he is much better these years, I just didn’t want to go over to the house and bother him and his wife with this non sense. I can stand on my own 2 feet. I thought and always will think that Sheldon's OK.
Lawyer number 3 talked to the retired supreme court judge. Lawyer number 3 was the contact person for lawyer number 4, who wrote the appeal. Because lawyer number 3 was witness to much of the court room proceedings, and because his neighbor happens to be the other associate judge at the Rolling Meadows court house. Breslin was probably was advised to make sure the appeal was frivolous, worthless, a no nothing appeal that will go no place, mean nothing to anybody. So that was a waste of another $9,000 or so. What are you going to do if a judge tells a lawyer play ball, my ball or else, I will make sure you will never practice law again.
This was just 2 more lawyers with no balls or guts, willfully, knowingly aided in a cover up, a successful cover up. Now we have;
* Scotillo,
* Tatooles (lawyer number1), his brother? with or without his trustees?
* Assistant State’s attorney Chandra & Andre (agents of Cook County State’s Attorney Richard Devine)
* Cook County State’s attorney’s office of Richard Devine
* Mark Wenrich of the Palatine Police Department, and his fellow brothers in various departments, public works, township agencies and districts, the mayor and her village trustees.
* Lawyer number 2, 3 and 4 and possible a retired supreme court justice now all on board
e8
9 - the appellate
Well the Appellate Court First Judicial District made their ruling. The appellate judges McNulty, PJ, Tully, O’Malley and JJ decided to join the party and have a ball. They praised Scotillo, Chandra and Andre and gave overwhelming praise and support to Palatine Police Officer Mark Wenrich.
The appellate court, most likely, assumed the facts that Scotillo allowed to be put into this case were correct, above board and honorable. But now, we must add the appellate court accountable of furthering deception, and now we have more con conspirators.
I let the many Cook county probation officers that were assigned to me know about this, the treatment centers know about this, the Maricopa county (AZ) probation know about this and nothing. I let people I knew in the Palatine fire department, public works departments, building departments, Village consul, township departments, customers, business owners, people in various school districts, societies and others that work within the government of other local municipalities. They are all on this game plan of sticking together and or there is nothing any one can do.
So by now;
The Appellate court added their 2 cents. We still have the original set of lies. After all this cover up with all the combined years of education, diplomas, degrees and training to uphold the law and law enforcement involved and potential combined in jail time that all participants of this party should be subject to is staggering.
Every right that I think I should have been entitled to, was denied me. I ask my team of lawyers “how come this exculpatory evidence and letting a dirty cop to continue doing what dirty cops do did not come out” and they just shrug their shoulders, “I don’t know”.
The appellate court, most likely, assumed the facts that Scotillo allowed to be put into this case were correct, above board and honorable. But now, we must add the appellate court accountable of furthering deception, and now we have more con conspirators.
I let the many Cook county probation officers that were assigned to me know about this, the treatment centers know about this, the Maricopa county (AZ) probation know about this and nothing. I let people I knew in the Palatine fire department, public works departments, building departments, Village consul, township departments, customers, business owners, people in various school districts, societies and others that work within the government of other local municipalities. They are all on this game plan of sticking together and or there is nothing any one can do.
So by now;
The Appellate court added their 2 cents. We still have the original set of lies. After all this cover up with all the combined years of education, diplomas, degrees and training to uphold the law and law enforcement involved and potential combined in jail time that all participants of this party should be subject to is staggering.
Every right that I think I should have been entitled to, was denied me. I ask my team of lawyers “how come this exculpatory evidence and letting a dirty cop to continue doing what dirty cops do did not come out” and they just shrug their shoulders, “I don’t know”.
e9
10 - the sleaze
During the testimony we discovered that Mark Wenrich’s only job experience prior to becoming a Police officer was a bar bouncer during college. I bet, I know what and where that bar was also. It is amazing in a small town what people know about each other.
Now lets get back to the “mother of all of his bumbling observations or lack of, or what he hallucinated to” lies, told by Mark Wenrich. Based upon what McNulty, PJ, Tully, O’Malley and JJ said and ruled is now law.
I think that McNulty, PJ, Tully, O’Malley and JJ, will now have to clarify;
Is this ruling recto active or does it start from the date of the ruling?
Since this ruling has praised and gave credit to Wenrich’s perjured testimony and to become case law, will all further perjured testimony by Wenrich, be given praise, credit and held harmless?
Since this ruling has praised and gave credit to Wenrich’s perjured testimony and to become case law, will the IDOT not be following the courts ruling by not changing the posted speed limit?
The appellate court ruling has set a precedent that can now be used to go after all traffic citations that state 35 mile per hour is the posted speed limit on that stretch of Rand. "With this case law, the IDOT 35 mile per hour posted speed limit on that stretch of Rand is not valid
That since Wenrich said “that posted speed limit is 40 miles per hour”, it is so, and the law
That since Illinois Department of Transportation says it is posted at 35 miles per hour, cannot be creditable, nor law.
All traffic citations and or any court testimony previous, during and after the McNulty, Pj, Tully, O’Malley and JJ’s ruling that involves any thing that would contradict the 40 miles per hour statement, which is false by reality, but true by the newly established fact of law, would be a violation of the higher courts decision.
All traffic citations and or any court testimony previous, during and after the McNulty, Pj, Tully, O’Malley and JJ’s ruling that involves any thing that would contradict the 40 miles per hour statement would be a violation of the higher courts decision and that all Judges, police officers and prosecutors who have ruled other wise are and will be violation of the higher courts order.
All traffic citations and or any court testimony previous, during and after the McNulty, Pj, Tully, O’Malley and JJ’s ruling that involves any thing that would contradict the 40 miles per hour statement would be a violation of the higher courts decision.
That Mark Wenrich of and including the Palatine Police department still issuing citations against and in direct contradiction of the McNulty, Pj, Tully, O’Malley and JJ’s ruling that involves any thing that would contradict the 40 miles per hour statement would be a violation of the higher courts decision.
That Cook Count State’s attorney’s office of Richard Devine and lower court judges are still prosecuting, passing judgment on traffic citations and or giving court testimony previous, contrary to the McNulty, Pj, Tully, O’Malley and JJ’s ruling that involves any thing that would contradict the 40 miles per hour statement would be a violation of the higher courts decision.
Since Mark Wenrich constantly testifies in other court rooms and the Cook County State’s attorneys agree, that the speed limit is 35 miles per hour, I consider this a on going conspiracy of a multitude of crimes against all parties that is still within its statue of limitations.
All to protect a crooked cop, in a crooked city of Palatine, Cook County, Illinois
A old saying comes to mind “garbage in, garbage out”
My team of lawyers starting with James Tatooles (the brother of the mayor of Inverness), lawyer number 2, lawyer number 3, and lawyer number 4 and the State’s Attorney of Cook County, Richard Devine, Assistant States Attorney of Cook County Shari Chandra, Michael Andre, Judge John J Scotillo, all went to extreme measures and violated every law, principal and oath, to protect a dirty cop who was probably intoxicated during the arrest and cover it up, while knowingly, becoming just as guilty or dirty as a crooked cop. All the schooling, education, knowledge of right and wrong, good and bad, just disappeared. I personally, think honesty is a good thing. I think there was a retired supreme court justice who talked to one of my lawyers about this case. Every one knew or now knows that this cop lied under oath, provided a false police report. The Appellate Court of Illinois, knowingly or not, seem to have dirt on them selves also. The old saying garbage in garbage out is what we have. I would guess that over half the cases the higher courts rule are based on lies presented at trial.
Now lets get back to the “mother of all of his bumbling observations or lack of, or what he hallucinated to” lies, told by Mark Wenrich. Based upon what McNulty, PJ, Tully, O’Malley and JJ said and ruled is now law.
I think that McNulty, PJ, Tully, O’Malley and JJ, will now have to clarify;
Is this ruling recto active or does it start from the date of the ruling?
Since this ruling has praised and gave credit to Wenrich’s perjured testimony and to become case law, will all further perjured testimony by Wenrich, be given praise, credit and held harmless?
Since this ruling has praised and gave credit to Wenrich’s perjured testimony and to become case law, will the IDOT not be following the courts ruling by not changing the posted speed limit?
The appellate court ruling has set a precedent that can now be used to go after all traffic citations that state 35 mile per hour is the posted speed limit on that stretch of Rand. "With this case law, the IDOT 35 mile per hour posted speed limit on that stretch of Rand is not valid
That since Wenrich said “that posted speed limit is 40 miles per hour”, it is so, and the law
That since Illinois Department of Transportation says it is posted at 35 miles per hour, cannot be creditable, nor law.
All traffic citations and or any court testimony previous, during and after the McNulty, Pj, Tully, O’Malley and JJ’s ruling that involves any thing that would contradict the 40 miles per hour statement, which is false by reality, but true by the newly established fact of law, would be a violation of the higher courts decision.
All traffic citations and or any court testimony previous, during and after the McNulty, Pj, Tully, O’Malley and JJ’s ruling that involves any thing that would contradict the 40 miles per hour statement would be a violation of the higher courts decision and that all Judges, police officers and prosecutors who have ruled other wise are and will be violation of the higher courts order.
All traffic citations and or any court testimony previous, during and after the McNulty, Pj, Tully, O’Malley and JJ’s ruling that involves any thing that would contradict the 40 miles per hour statement would be a violation of the higher courts decision.
That Mark Wenrich of and including the Palatine Police department still issuing citations against and in direct contradiction of the McNulty, Pj, Tully, O’Malley and JJ’s ruling that involves any thing that would contradict the 40 miles per hour statement would be a violation of the higher courts decision.
That Cook Count State’s attorney’s office of Richard Devine and lower court judges are still prosecuting, passing judgment on traffic citations and or giving court testimony previous, contrary to the McNulty, Pj, Tully, O’Malley and JJ’s ruling that involves any thing that would contradict the 40 miles per hour statement would be a violation of the higher courts decision.
Since Mark Wenrich constantly testifies in other court rooms and the Cook County State’s attorneys agree, that the speed limit is 35 miles per hour, I consider this a on going conspiracy of a multitude of crimes against all parties that is still within its statue of limitations.
All to protect a crooked cop, in a crooked city of Palatine, Cook County, Illinois
A old saying comes to mind “garbage in, garbage out”
My team of lawyers starting with James Tatooles (the brother of the mayor of Inverness), lawyer number 2, lawyer number 3, and lawyer number 4 and the State’s Attorney of Cook County, Richard Devine, Assistant States Attorney of Cook County Shari Chandra, Michael Andre, Judge John J Scotillo, all went to extreme measures and violated every law, principal and oath, to protect a dirty cop who was probably intoxicated during the arrest and cover it up, while knowingly, becoming just as guilty or dirty as a crooked cop. All the schooling, education, knowledge of right and wrong, good and bad, just disappeared. I personally, think honesty is a good thing. I think there was a retired supreme court justice who talked to one of my lawyers about this case. Every one knew or now knows that this cop lied under oath, provided a false police report. The Appellate Court of Illinois, knowingly or not, seem to have dirt on them selves also. The old saying garbage in garbage out is what we have. I would guess that over half the cases the higher courts rule are based on lies presented at trial.
e10
11 - lie like a rug state trooper
Point in case is a is my 2nd dui (20 years ago?) in which the Appellate court ruled that the crooked Illinois State Police officer testimony was creditable. The state appealed my trial, I did not have money for reprenstation and Tatooles was not going to do any thing, with out cod. so guilty by default.
I provided evidence that the State troopers report was false and the testimony would be perjury, Tatooles did nothing to let the court know that the cop was committing perjury. I had photos, showing the cop could not see what he saw, but this went on death ears. I complained to the State police and showed them photos, but nothing was done. So this dirty state trooper, continued to lie, cheat, corrupt the court systems (like Drew Peterson) until a ripe old age, then collect a nice retirement package. A honest cop or lawyer are far and few in-between.
I provided evidence that the State troopers report was false and the testimony would be perjury, Tatooles did nothing to let the court know that the cop was committing perjury. I had photos, showing the cop could not see what he saw, but this went on death ears. I complained to the State police and showed them photos, but nothing was done. So this dirty state trooper, continued to lie, cheat, corrupt the court systems (like Drew Peterson) until a ripe old age, then collect a nice retirement package. A honest cop or lawyer are far and few in-between.
12 - officer Baker
Now there is another thing,
There is this other cop, Baker, hired in Palatine to target selected trucks and trailers?, then I heard he was picking on landscaper trailers. Also as many know, when my brother got pulled over by Baker, Baker solicited a discount for cash, something like $1100. He also said something like “it would be higher if he had to take you in”. You would have to ask my brother. Well my brother who was driving asked if he would get a receipt or something like that, then this cop went nuts. As a result my brother was arrested, who just got out of the military after serving 20 years for this country was now is going to cook county jail unless we came up with a $1300 fine. I can add other stories of intimation about this cop that I have heard, from many people who have been doing business in Palatine far before this cop was even a twinkle. Maybe this is village policy, cash payments on pull overs other wise this seems like a old fashion, run of the mill, standard, bribe..
If it is not the policy of the Palatine Police Department to offer discounts for cash on site for a road side pull over, I want this police officer arrested, I want every one arrested and or I make a citizen arrest.
I guarantee, he has not pulled over the guy who gave the mayor $350,000 extra for her house.
I wonder if this was the Palatine cop, I and another person saw in a marked squad car, parked at a bank cash station one Saturday morning at about 5:30 am and he was doing a transaction. I mean what does a cop need to do at a cash station at this hour. I would bet, a cash deposit. In a account that may not be linked on the surface. I have a good idea of other shake down sources, not hard. Start at bars that offer blue light specials, volume discount, big in cash, that the village went out of their way to relocate or maintain. How ever this shake would be more of a group thing.
There is this other cop, Baker, hired in Palatine to target selected trucks and trailers?, then I heard he was picking on landscaper trailers. Also as many know, when my brother got pulled over by Baker, Baker solicited a discount for cash, something like $1100. He also said something like “it would be higher if he had to take you in”. You would have to ask my brother. Well my brother who was driving asked if he would get a receipt or something like that, then this cop went nuts. As a result my brother was arrested, who just got out of the military after serving 20 years for this country was now is going to cook county jail unless we came up with a $1300 fine. I can add other stories of intimation about this cop that I have heard, from many people who have been doing business in Palatine far before this cop was even a twinkle. Maybe this is village policy, cash payments on pull overs other wise this seems like a old fashion, run of the mill, standard, bribe..
If it is not the policy of the Palatine Police Department to offer discounts for cash on site for a road side pull over, I want this police officer arrested, I want every one arrested and or I make a citizen arrest.
I guarantee, he has not pulled over the guy who gave the mayor $350,000 extra for her house.
I wonder if this was the Palatine cop, I and another person saw in a marked squad car, parked at a bank cash station one Saturday morning at about 5:30 am and he was doing a transaction. I mean what does a cop need to do at a cash station at this hour. I would bet, a cash deposit. In a account that may not be linked on the surface. I have a good idea of other shake down sources, not hard. Start at bars that offer blue light specials, volume discount, big in cash, that the village went out of their way to relocate or maintain. How ever this shake would be more of a group thing.
13 - Palatine mayor and her club
After watching a few village board meetings in which Palatine residents came to the meetings and complained about board members, lying, trickery, then hear one of the guys sitting on the village board, saying, this is not on the agenda, we will not discuss it, sit down or get out. The mayor and the rest of the board members have displayed lack of honesty, respect and good government. This right here is a felony offense
The mayor sold her house for twice what it was worth $630,000? To who? No bid - no permit Bob? Who tore down most of Palatine? Who seems to have privileges, not available to others? Who gets $65,000? every 2" of snow fall?
Who can gets inspectors fired? Who supplies job security after Palatine? hahahahahahah not me.
A few of us, in town, have a good idea what some of these perks are, and the very person in Cook County who the mayor and village council seemed to be at odds with, is also privy.
It would be funny but sad, to see the mayor and village council members arrested, the next time they are on TV making a public beef about Todd Storgers. Arrests are at the choosing of the cook county state's attorney's office. But looking at dirt there... hard to say. I would bet that the Mayors daughter might not want to go on TV any more also.
Well any way, the next mayor can expect a landslide house sale.
I'm sure Rita's real estate deal ideal came from the history of Park District and price rigging property purchase (if they can do it, and get away with it, so can I)
Because of the massive development in down town Palatine, puts us to unlimited corruption. to uncover.
I know and we know that Village inspectors and others are forced to look the other way or face the consequences of termination, re:Gary, Harry, just to name a few (certain people know exactly what I mean)
I can tell you what fire hydrants are allowed not to work, which restaurants are allowed not to have grease traps. It goes on and on and on.
The mayor sold her house for twice what it was worth $630,000? To who? No bid - no permit Bob? Who tore down most of Palatine? Who seems to have privileges, not available to others? Who gets $65,000? every 2" of snow fall?
Who can gets inspectors fired? Who supplies job security after Palatine? hahahahahahah not me.
A few of us, in town, have a good idea what some of these perks are, and the very person in Cook County who the mayor and village council seemed to be at odds with, is also privy.
It would be funny but sad, to see the mayor and village council members arrested, the next time they are on TV making a public beef about Todd Storgers. Arrests are at the choosing of the cook county state's attorney's office. But looking at dirt there... hard to say. I would bet that the Mayors daughter might not want to go on TV any more also.
Well any way, the next mayor can expect a landslide house sale.
I'm sure Rita's real estate deal ideal came from the history of Park District and price rigging property purchase (if they can do it, and get away with it, so can I)
Because of the massive development in down town Palatine, puts us to unlimited corruption. to uncover.
I know and we know that Village inspectors and others are forced to look the other way or face the consequences of termination, re:Gary, Harry, just to name a few (certain people know exactly what I mean)
I can tell you what fire hydrants are allowed not to work, which restaurants are allowed not to have grease traps. It goes on and on and on.
14 - Bollingbrook north
Just like Bollingbrook, the cops know the dirt on the Village Board and the Village Board knows the dirt on the cops, so every one is staying put.
If I had some help, in as little as a few months I could find enough corruption to put a bunch of the palatine police, village board and others in jail for a long time. Or just play "lets make a deal" with some one. Instead of 40 years in jail, give him 10.
Also like Bollingbrook, what can a person do, make a report on a dirty cop to another dirty cop?
If I had some help, in as little as a few months I could find enough corruption to put a bunch of the palatine police, village board and others in jail for a long time. Or just play "lets make a deal" with some one. Instead of 40 years in jail, give him 10.
Also like Bollingbrook, what can a person do, make a report on a dirty cop to another dirty cop?
15 - just wanted honesty at my trial
I just wanted honesty at my trial.
If you have gotten this far, good for you, no body helped me.
Honesty has probably, pissed off a bunch or 2 or 3.
I got balls and guts, to demand the truth, to stand up for what I feel is right. I expect honesty, integrity and high standards from a court of law, which is well worth respect, which was totally, obviously absent. I under stand and know that harm will probably become me and/or I expect a slew of high priced lawyers coming after me.
Most people in town (Palatine) I called home, for a long time, know that I get things done, licensed plumber, I'm honest, fair, discount when I can, don't cheat, steal, inflate, I give a honest count to the best of my ability (can't please everybody all the time).
For Instance: A toilet backs up, I have seen many times plumbers often tell the home owners right off the bat, sewer got to be dug up (high price item) and dig it they do. If I get involved, often but not always, I disagree and with a little hard work and effort, I often am correct, at a much lower price.
I'm a no bullshit guy "no bullshit Mike" and some times it's nice to deal with such and some times not.......
16 - corrupt states attorney's office of Cook County
States Attorney and Assistant states
Here we have the maybe 8,000 prosecuted speeding tickets written by Officer Mark Wenrich before, during and after my incident. These tickets have been ruled on / judged by other judges, which contradict this trial judges ruling, the Appellate courts ruling, the arresting officer Mark Wenrich’s testimony in my trial and the arrest report.
The States Attorney office of Cook County and the Assistant States Attorneys have prosecuted the maybe 8,000 speeding tickets written by officer Mark Wenrich, who has sworn under oath the speed limit is 35 mph. But the police report and testimony in my case / trial, state that the speed limit is 40 mph. This is in direct contradiction to maybe 8,000 plus another 100,000 court room convictions in other court rooms, other judges, maybe Scotillo participated in some of these rulings. This would mean another conflict. Surely the States Attorney office of
17 - dirt
attorney,
State’s Attorney of Cook County Richard Devine
Assistant States Attorney Michael Andre
Administrative Services
69 W. Washington,
(312 603-1880
Special Prosecutions
2650 S. California
(773) 869-2715
This was a typical case in which the judiciary demands that citizens obey the law but ignores the law itself. Where the evidence is subjective not objective.The judicial system has shown its ugly corrupt head and mistreated me.
Palatine Police officer Mark Wenrich lied repeatedly and blatantly about matters at the heart of the traffic stop and concerning creditability. He has shown no regret for his actions, which significantly impeded the trial. Unless the whole of the state of
This case/trial is and was full of prosecutor and judicial misconduct, abuse and oppression. There was a failure to disclose favorable evidence and falsifying evidence. False statements were caused by the intentional, reckless and/or negligent acts of the prosecutions office. The State Attorney of Cook County Richard Devine and the Assistant States Attorneys Shari Chandra and Michael Andre intentionally, maliciously and/or . . . recklessly investigated and prosecuted. They took a police report that was factually incorrect from its conception from a police officer who perhaps was intoxicated at the time of the arrest (how else could a person logically explain why the police officer did not know where he pulled me over and the color of the car I was driving unless the police officer was death dumb and blind. To this date there has been no oops, I made a mistake by anyone). This police officer was rated at highly professional and creditable by the courts.
I think there was defamation, interference, civil rights violation, and slander also to me. You call a person that lie's to your face under oath more creditable that a person who tells the truth, to me is ass-a-dine
The States Attorneys office of
The States Attorney office of
The States Attorney office of
The prosecutor’s office is liable for knowingly supervise, participate and assisting Officer Mark Wenrich in his perjured testimony.
This indictment against or other criminal proceedings based on the prosecutor misconduct, abuse and oppression should not have taken place.
Prosecutor misconduct of perjury, threatening and coercing witnesses, concealing, falsifying evidence and oppression was a pattern through out this trial. As a result the associate Judge John J Scotillo, the appellate judges McNulty, P.J., Tully, O’Malley and JJ have now praised, gave honor, creditability and encourage perjury, dishonesty and corruption. I personally don’t think any one who pays such tribute is worth of much.
18 - exculpatory
Exculpatory evidence is the evidence favorable to the defendant in a criminal trial, which clears or tends to clear the defendant of guilt. In many countries such as the United States, if the police or prosecutor has found such evidence, he/she must disclose it to the defendant. The prosecution's failure to disclose exculpatory evidence can result in the dismissal of a case. The opposite is inculpatory evidence, which tends to prove a person's guilt.
A victim is murdered by stabbing and an accused person is arrested for the murder. Evidence includes a knife covered with blood near the victim and the accused found covered in blood at the murder scene by the police. During the investigation, the police interview a witness claiming to have watched the stabbing occur. The witness makes a statement to the police claiming the stabbing was by another unknown person, not the accused.
The police officers statement, testimony and report are exculpatory evidence, since it could introduce reasonable doubt as to the creditability of the police officer. The police officer knew the evidence, report and testimony is not, was not and would be not and never would be a true.
19 - corrupt cook county states attorney's office
The State's Attorney of Cook County office and the Assistant State’s Attorneys Shari Chandra and Michael Andre knew that the officer Wenrich wrote maybe 8,000 speeding tickets in that speed zone and testified under oath that the speed limit is 35 mph not 40 mph, marked by 2 posted 35 mph signs. The States Attorney office of Cook County and the Assistant States Attorneys prosecuted these tickets and naturally judges have past judgment.
Here we have the maybe 8,000 prosecuted speeding tickets written by Officer Mark Wenrich before, during and after my incident. These tickets have been ruled on / judged by other judges, which contradict this trial judges ruling, the Appellate courts ruling, the arresting officer Mark Wenrich’s testimony in my trial and the arrest report.
The States Attorney office of Cook County and the Assistant States Attorneys have prosecuted the maybe 8,000 speeding tickets written by officer Mark Wenrich, who has sworn under oath the speed limit is 35 mph. But the police report and testimony in my case / trial, state that the speed limit is 40 mph. This is in direct contradiction to maybe 8,000 plus another 100,000 court room convictions in other court rooms, other judges, maybe Scotillo participated in some of these rulings. This would mean another conflict. Surely the States Attorney office of Cook County and the Assistant States Attorneys have prosecuted all of these cases. This looks like incompetence, corruption, a lackadaisical judicial system. But this is Cook County, Illinois, what would you expect? This is just standard issue we all have to deal with.
I have sent email to Anita Alvarez, Richard Devine and Richard Daley (ha, he gave a prime example of the dirt in the States attorney's office of Cook county, when he said he new nothing of the Chicago police department torturing residents of Chicago at their own disggression). He then became a long term mayor of Chicago. (As far as I know, no body was held accountable). If he did not know what is going on he should be held accountable for that simple little fact.
Here we have the maybe 8,000 prosecuted speeding tickets written by Officer Mark Wenrich before, during and after my incident. These tickets have been ruled on / judged by other judges, which contradict this trial judges ruling, the Appellate courts ruling, the arresting officer Mark Wenrich’s testimony in my trial and the arrest report.
The States Attorney office of Cook County and the Assistant States Attorneys have prosecuted the maybe 8,000 speeding tickets written by officer Mark Wenrich, who has sworn under oath the speed limit is 35 mph. But the police report and testimony in my case / trial, state that the speed limit is 40 mph. This is in direct contradiction to maybe 8,000 plus another 100,000 court room convictions in other court rooms, other judges, maybe Scotillo participated in some of these rulings. This would mean another conflict. Surely the States Attorney office of Cook County and the Assistant States Attorneys have prosecuted all of these cases. This looks like incompetence, corruption, a lackadaisical judicial system. But this is Cook County, Illinois, what would you expect? This is just standard issue we all have to deal with.
I have sent email to Anita Alvarez, Richard Devine and Richard Daley (ha, he gave a prime example of the dirt in the States attorney's office of Cook county, when he said he new nothing of the Chicago police department torturing residents of Chicago at their own disggression). He then became a long term mayor of Chicago. (As far as I know, no body was held accountable). If he did not know what is going on he should be held accountable for that simple little fact.
20 - shaim, shaim, shaim
The State's Attorney of Cook County Richard Devine, the
The States Attorney’s office knew by running the plates that the color of the car was not the color of the car on the police report. The color was gold not silver.
21 - so right now
So right now,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
I have had all my credit cards terminated.
I receive 250 phone calls a day (credit card collection agencies).
Credit card company lawyers suing me.
Yellow page phone book garnished a bank account got $65? The bank charged me $200? for this....... Had no money to pay. The bank closed that account and still seeking funds, so much for that bank account.
Could not make Bank America credit card payments so they, closed my checking account got $23, and are suing me, so much for that bank account.
I can't afford general liability insurance which is necessary for my Illinois plumbers contractors license.
Income for the past 3 months been about `$300.00.
Some one else is paying my phone bill.
Don't have a drivers license.
Don't file income tax any more.
I have federal tax liens against me.
Can't open a bank account, credit is shot, If I did, some one would take every thing, bank will close the account and sue me for the costs of the garnishment. So why bother?
Maybe I look into welfare, food stamps, or something.
No health insurance, no social security, I get sick, tough, I'm sol
I got robed out side of Oklahoma city, took all my Id, don't have any.
Living with a family, not paying rent (how could I), if I aint here I'll go to a shelter.
I'm sure a Palatine cop or 2 or 3 or a few others, higher up the food chain would like to take care of me and if they found the opportunity, I am sure they would give it a try.
If my blogs, my fuss, my speaking out, can prevent one lie, in one court by a cop, prosecutor or judge. I guess I have fulfilled my job with this mess? Pete once said to me, the reason god gave me this problem, is because he knows I can handle it.
Pete Phillippi was my journey man plumber. He lived in Palatine all his life. Installed plumbing in a good percentage of homes and business in town. Was a navy seal ww2 off the coast of Normandy. He even told me he was a palatine cop back in 49?
Pete, Stew S, Ron M, Jim R, Bob H, Vern Bergman, right off the bat (and others) could tell you stories about Palatine 70 years ago. Stories that that nobody could imagine. I talked to Marylin (historical society) a long time ago about folks still around that have a life time of good stories, but she never cared (Vern x township highway commissioner and probably the first, that Baker tried to nail as he loaded up one of his trucks while parked in a loading dock of another merchant). Just like that time I came across a burial grounds other side of the cemetery on Smith, 2 feet deep and I came across a treasure of stuff (bottles, plates forks spoons, etc). She didn't care. Once again, I was the only one that cared.
22 - appellate court / Illinois department of transportation disagree
Who is right appellate court or traffice court
Associate Judge John J Scotillo, the Appellate Judges McNulty, P.J., Tully, O’Malley and JJ judge John J Scotillo, Palatine police officer Mark Wenrich, the State Attorney of Cook County Richard Devine and the Assistant States Attorneys Shari Chandra and Michael Andre all seem to have no problem with this conflict of testimony, while in other court rooms, in front of other judges the State Attorney office of Cook County and the Assistant States Attorneys prosecute and other judges convict on facts which were contrary to this police report. Other judges have ruled that the posted speed limit on that road is 35mph not 40 mph as given in testimony.
So now we have judges rule constantly contrary to one another, on a simple speed limit sign. Since the appellate court over rules lower judges then every speeding ticket that was a conviction based upon police officer Mark Wenrich’s testimony that the speed limit is 35 mph, must be overturned. All other tickets past present and future. Some one should tell the Illinois Department of Transportation and the Secretary of State of Illinois that the courts cant make up their mind as to what the law is or the law is what ever officer Mark Wenrich says.
The judges that prosecute on facts are correct or the judges who ruled on false facts such as in my case are not correct. Somebody or some judge is not telling the truth and are not creditable.
Associate Judge John J Scotillo, the Appellate Judges McNulty, P.J., Tully, O’Malley and JJ judge John J Scotillo, Palatine police officer Mark Wenrich, the State Attorney of Cook County Richard Devine and the Assistant States Attorneys Shari Chandra and Michael Andre all seem to think they have the right to contradict the 50 thousand or so verdicts from other judges.
The States Attorney office of Cook County and the Assistant States Attorneys Shari Chandra and Michael Andre knowingly accepted that the police officer report was false, inaccurate, misrepresented facts, a lie and unethical.
This was Shari Chandra first trial (talked about after trial when the judge, defense lawyer and prosecuting attorneys were praising them self’s).
Her zealous prosecution and perpetrating a fraud upon the court could be what is taught and the way law schools are training lawyers these days.
The State Attorney of Cook County office and the Assistant State Attorneys interest in the prosecution was to win, and for the unscrupulous, unethical practice to win regardless of the guilt or innocence of the testimony
The Assistant States Attorneys career path could be injured by failing to win, showing the lack of skill as a prosecutor for a lost criminal case, or poor professional judgment in obtaining an indictment which later was dismissed.
The prosecutor's career path is enhanced by being, and being known as "winner", which enables the prosecutor to get more visible cases, and to obtain higher position and compensation in the prosecutor's office. Also, the career path for the successful prosecutor, as we have seen from the past, can go right up to the White House or to the position as Attorney General or as a federal judge at any of the 3 levels (District Court, Circuit Court of Appeals and the Supreme Court).
The loss of a criminal case once commenced through obtaining an indictment can cause a major reversal in a prosecutor's planned career, and with such pressure to succeed, what difference (the prosecutor argues to himself) does it make if the prosecutor cuts a few corners here and there. The defendant is probably guilty, of something, if not the crime for which he/she has been indicted.
I hired additional lawyers to review this case most were appalled by the trial actions. Others had further praise for the parties involved. I used several to argue further in post trial motions. But again and again there was praise from the judge and States Attorney’s office of
23 - pre trial, planing a crime in the judges chambers
Also there is another potential problem
In the pre trial conference (in private), assistant states attorney Chandra, Andre, defense lawyer Tatooles and judge Scotillo reviewed the evidence and clarified the issues in dispute and knowingly knew that any omission of these facts would have been misleading the court, a encouragement of perjury, a unlawful activity. I submit that they all decided to conceal this truthfulness from the court room arguments. Chandra will get her first slam dunk winning case. Tatooles does his brother a favor (mayor of the neighboring town
I do not think an investigation of this close door meeting will reveal any thing. Evidence of this perjury and lawlessness is perfectly clear. Black and white corruption was involved in this case. The case is over, done, gone, why come clean now? Mike Mars is nobody and who will know who cares? There are big stakes here (judicial, prosecutor, attorney and police misconduct) besides now, every one can play the blame game, or continue to skirt around the truth. Non accountability has come to be the American way.
I say this because for some reason the black and white police report was riddled with false information. The states attorney’s office and defense attorneys knowingly knew this was a fraud and the fact that during the trial there was a total absence of this information. The judge, states attorney’s office vigorously praised this cop and my lawyer said nothing, kept his mouth shut about this deception in the trial.
24 - who is worth respect?
Also there is another potential problem
During this trial, some real facts are different then the facts presented in the court, the lawyers in the case went out of their way to conceal the truth.
How can you call a judge creditable when he praises a cope that lied in front of him?
Or how can you call a judge your honor when activities are less than honorable?
Or how can you call a states attorney creditable when they praise a cop that lied?
Or how can you call a defense attorney creditable when he knew a deception of the court is or was taking place?
Or how can u call a appellate court justices creditable, when they back a judge, and states attorney office that praises a dirty cop?
Actions by the police, my lawyers, prosecutors and judges seem to have violated loads of rules and regulations by which they are sworn to uphold.
This was not the first time the courts violated me but this time it made me a felon.
Can we assume the prosecutor’s office is full of this type of behavior or this is the only case? What about judges? No body complains because they are afraid of the consequences, employment, social circle, or something, again they use only laws that they want to use.
Now there is another question, is this the one and only case they have acted in this judicial miss conduct manor? Or do they do this every day?
Now there is another issue, I find it repulsive that the courts, judges and prosecutors pay tribute to corruption, dishonesty, lawlessness (That is what the courts have ruled in my case). To promote and allow this professional misbehavior of the police and themselves is unfathomable but courts go on, continue day after day. This is surly another nail in the justice system coffin and
Or is it this, my case only and in other trials the letter of law is followed?
None the less, this behavior is an embarrassment to every thing the Law and Order and the criminal justice system has to offer.
Or on Mondays and Wednesdays the letter of the law is followed and on Tuesday, Thursday and Friday it is any thing goes?
If every one else can lie and get away with it, then my equal rights were violated, I should have been given the right to lie as much as the system did. Where are my equal rights to violate the law as others in my case?
Every one in my case and trial are amongst the most self – righteous people in our waning society.
These true charges of conduct unbecoming an officer should be dealt with accordingly, regardless if it is a police officer or officer of the court or the court its self.
e12
25 - guilty, but not limited to
I believe lawyers, the States Attorney office of Cook County and the Assistant States Attorneys Shari Chandra and Michael Andre, the Associate judge and the Appellate judges are guilty of the following but not limited to (please note some of these may be repetitive);
Intent to commit crime – this did happen
Intent to perpetrate fraud – this did happen
Knowledge of attorney misconduct – this did happen
Defending against the suggestion of a accusation of wrongful conduct- this did happen
Scope of attorney's duty to disclose- this did happen
Attorney misconduct, duty to report false testimony- this did happen
Disclosure of false statement by police – this did happen
Knowingly supplied a expert witnesses with a false accounting of facts- this did happen
In post-judgment proceedings further deception of the court – this did happen
Duty to report false statements – this did happen
Ethical obligations – non here
Disciplinary complaints – I’m the only one complaining
Disclosure – none here
ARDC, failure to report of attorney malpractice – no one was interested but me
Attorney’s duty to disclose fraud upon the court fraud – no one was interested but me
Permissive disclosure – non in trial
Scope of attorney's duty to disclose – not in this trial
Vicarious disqualification – not here
Post-judgment proceedings, continued to perpetrate this fraud – yes it did
Scope of representation – a miss representation of facts
Appearance of impropriety – you bet
Duty to adequately represent the people of
Duty to report attorney misconduct, see Attorney misconduct – not here
Duty to report professional misconduct, see Attorney misconduct – not here
False statements – all over this case
Misleading the public – all over this case
Impropriety, appearance of, sees Appearance of impropriety – I think so
Incriminating information – the whole case was a fraud
Duty to report misconduct – only me
Lawyer misconduct, see Attorney misconduct
Advocated by attorney but opposed by client – my lawyer knew all the facts, knew about the incorrect police report and the false perjured testimony by the police officer, during the trial I kept asking him about this but nothing was said.
Unauthorized practice of law – every one participated in this,
Misleading statements - many
Misrepresentation of fact or law, duty of lawyer to avoid – no one cared
Material changes in document, duty to advise opposing counsel – well no one told me the game plan, I picked it up at the end that something went wrong, that is why I tried to correct it by further litigation
Adequate representation – not in my case
Continuance – my lawyer was not prepared, he even admitted it
Misleading or deceptive use – my trial was a free for all
Conflict of interests – my lawyer’s brother is mayor of neighboring town that relies on
Fairness to, negotiations – not in my case
Perjury, see false statements – throughout the trial
Preparation of, inadequate representation – yep my legal team
Scopes of representation – lawyers are club members, defendants are nothing but income
Adequate Preparation by attorney inadequate representation - absolutely
Rules of professional conduct – were non here
Scope of duty to disclose – what duty
Professional judgment – a joke
Appearance of impropriety – not to the courts or prosecutors
Disciplinary action – probably not, it’s all a club
File and disclose ARDC complaint – only me
The police officer as a witness should have been disqualified because of the perjury and other actions
Zealous representation of prosecution, truthfulness to opposing counsel, - was not here
Made improper extrajudicial statements – very much
Lack of professional integrity in the fullest sense of those terms – this was done by all
Mindful of our obligations to the administration of justice, which is a truth-seeking process – did not take place in my trial
Deceiving the court subverting the truth finding process – absolutely, every one did this, even the judges
26 - more
Quality of justice, personal conscience, professional responsibilities, and exercise of sensitive professional and moral judgment guided by the basic principles underlying the rules, legal profession is unique in this respect because of the close relationship between the profession and the processes of government and law enforcement. Lawyers play a vital role in the preservation of society – not in this case
Failure to comply with an obligation or prohibition imposed by a rule is a basis for invoking the disciplinary process. The rules presuppose that disciplinary assessment of a lawyer's conduct will be made on the basis of the facts and circumstances as they existed at the time of the conduct in question and in recognition of the fact that a lawyer often has to act upon uncertain or incomplete evidence of the situation – the police report written at the time of the arrest, which was the basics of every thing is factual incorrect and the fact that other judges have ruled so
Knowingly knew, and promoted fraudulent - The States Attorney office of Cook County and the Assistant States Attorneys Shari Chandra and Michael Andre, my defense team and the judges are guilty of this
Inadequate preparation – this was my lawyer
Falsify evidence or counsel or assist a witness to testify falsely - The States Attorney office of
Make a false statement of material fact - The States Attorney office of
Assisting a criminal or fraudulent act by police officer Mark Wenrich.
A statement of another person that the lawyer knows is false.
Misrepresentations can also occur by failure to act – this occurred in my trial, case
Assisted Officer Mark Wenrich’s crime or fraud. – is what the States Attorney office of
Conceal or knowingly fail to disclose that which [the lawyer] is required by law to reveal – what law, there is no law in these court houses
27 - more
Lawyers having knowledge that another lawyer has committed a violation of the rules of professional conduct that raises a substantial question as to that lawyer's honesty, trustworthiness, or fitness as a lawyer in other respects, shall inform the appropriate professional authority – not in this case.
Lawyers having knowledge that a judge has committed a violation of applicable rules of judicial conduct that raises a substantial question as to the judge's fitness for office shall inform the appropriate authority. – not in this case.
Self-regulation of the legal profession requires that members of the profession initiate disciplinary investigation when they know of a violation of the Rules of Professional Conduct. Lawyers have a similar obligation with respect to judicial misconduct. An apparently isolated violation may indicate a pattern of misconduct that only a disciplinary investigation can uncover. Reporting a violation is especially important where the victim is unlikely to discover the offense – not in my case.
A report should be made to the bar disciplinary agency unless some other agency, such as a peer review agency, is more appropriate in the circumstances. Similar considerations apply to the reporting of judicial misconduct – I am the only one interested in the truth.
28 - misconduct 1
It is professional misconduct for a lawyer to:
(a)Violate or attempt to violate the rules of professional conduct, knowingly assist or induce another to do so, or do so through the acts of another – this case is full of it.
(b) Commit a criminal act that reflects adversely on the lawyer's honesty, trustworthiness or fitness as a lawyer in other respects – this case is full of it.
(c) Engage in conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit or misrepresentation - the State's Attorney of Cook County Richard Devine, Anita Alvarez, the Assistant State’s Attorneys Shari Chandra and Michael Andre, defense team and judges seem guilt of this.
(d) Fail to cooperate during the course of an ethics investigation or disciplinary proceedings – don't look like it, we are still in the cover up phase.
(e) State or imply an ability to influence improperly a government agency or official; or
(f) Knowingly assist a judge or judicial officer in conduct that is a violation of applicable rules of judicial conduct or other law – yep.
(a)Violate or attempt to violate the rules of professional conduct, knowingly assist or induce another to do so, or do so through the acts of another – this case is full of it.
(b) Commit a criminal act that reflects adversely on the lawyer's honesty, trustworthiness or fitness as a lawyer in other respects – this case is full of it.
(c) Engage in conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit or misrepresentation - the State's Attorney of Cook County Richard Devine, Anita Alvarez, the Assistant State’s Attorneys Shari Chandra and Michael Andre, defense team and judges seem guilt of this.
(d) Fail to cooperate during the course of an ethics investigation or disciplinary proceedings – don't look like it, we are still in the cover up phase.
(e) State or imply an ability to influence improperly a government agency or official; or
(f) Knowingly assist a judge or judicial officer in conduct that is a violation of applicable rules of judicial conduct or other law – yep.
29 - misconduct 2
Although a lawyer is personally answerable to the entire criminal law, a lawyer should be professionally answerable only for offenses that indicate lack of those characteristics relevant to law practice. Offenses involving violence, dishonesty or breach of trust are in that category. A pattern of repeated offenses, even ones of minor significance when considered separately, can indicate indifference to legal obligation – is this another worthless code of honor?
A lack of courtesy, civility among members of the profession. A lack of respect for the judiciary and for our systems of justice. A lack of regard for others, for the common good – no common good here, in my trial.
(a) A lawyer having knowledge that another lawyer has committed a violation of the of Professional Conduct that raises a substantial question as to that lawyer's honesty, trustworthiness or fitness as a lawyer in other respects, should inform the appropriate professional authority – I think so.
(b) A lawyer having knowledge that a judge has committed a violation of applicable rules of judicial conduct that raises a substantial question as to the judge's fitness for office should inform the appropriate authority - I seem to be the only one that thinks so.
A lack of courtesy, civility among members of the profession. A lack of respect for the judiciary and for our systems of justice. A lack of regard for others, for the common good – no common good here, in my trial.
(a) A lawyer having knowledge that another lawyer has committed a violation of the of Professional Conduct that raises a substantial question as to that lawyer's honesty, trustworthiness or fitness as a lawyer in other respects, should inform the appropriate professional authority – I think so.
(b) A lawyer having knowledge that a judge has committed a violation of applicable rules of judicial conduct that raises a substantial question as to the judge's fitness for office should inform the appropriate authority - I seem to be the only one that thinks so.
30 - the start of Arizona nightmare
Adult Probation Officer, Interstate Compact Unit, Darla Foutz
8-9-06
The first and only first year of my 3 year probation was IPS (intensive probation service). In this first year I had to complete the following successfully. One slip up and I would be in violation and in jail;
$5600 in court fines
$1200.00 in probation fees
750 hours of community service (3 hours per session x 250 days) 1300 hrs served (my probation was at a bar (Amvets), they needed additional free labor. They gave me certificate of gratitude and thanks.
8.5 months at an alcohol treatment center (4 hour sessions x 4 days per week)
Check in with the judge every 3 months (4 times a year) x 3 years
Check into the probation department 2 times a week (2 times a week x 52 weeks = 104)
Phone into the probation department 3 times a week (3 times a week x 52 weeks = 156)
Receiving phone calls from cook county probation dept (7 times a night x 52 = 2555) x 3 years
7 am to 7 pm curfew 5 days a week
Total curfew week ends
Not permitted to leave the county
I completed this “intensive probation service”. I am now on regular probation. I paid 4 lawyers to represent myself. My case has been appealed to a higher court and we are waiting for a decision. On the 14 of August I could have lawyer # 3 be in front of the sentencing judge for a document stating that I am no longer on IPS and that I have successfully meet all the obligations set before me by the court.
My current adult probation department probation officer is George Hernandez at 847-818-2362.
Thank you,
Mike Mars
31 - getting out of Arizona
Probation officer's in Illinois knew of this illegal activity. They don't care. The wicked witch probation officer I had in Arizona did not care. No one cares.
After making my transfer to Arizona, I started to set up shop, I started a corporation, I acquired workman’s comp and general liability insurance. I studied the residential and commercial plumbing laws of
I did all sorts of work for CMC, all over the valley.
These were rotten people, first month I was at this cmc, they were plotting to kill a guy who wanted to get paid for painting like a 1/2 mile of curb at a complex. I kept saying, the guy just wants to get paid, so why don't you just pay him....... he made to much, some thing like that was the answer. Mario had the Italian friend by the name of Louie Caruso, Glendale Az,, from Chicago, move to California then to Arizona (I wast told, he spent time in a fed pen in California, by Mario and that he was apart of organized crime, his right hand man is bald with a tatoo over every inch of his body?). As far as I know they killed him or mugged him as to not want any money. I told the probation officer about this and more, she did not care.
see my az dirt blog, (I got 46 blogs and growing to work on, so I might not have every thing I want to say on the blog when you might want to look at it (or any blog, for that mater))
Observing all the hood winks that these guys are getting away with.
One time I saw Mario pick a garden hose that was laying in the sewer and fill the water cooler with it. I said what are you doing? They’ll never know. After that I make sure I filled the water cooler bottle with clean water from a clean receptor.
After about 7 months I needed to get some money (past 2 years no income in Illinois, surviving on credit cards, which are maxed out) this led to arguments. They owed me about $25,000, gave me a paid in full check for about $4,300, take it or leave it. I tore it up, gave it back to them. (took photo of the check (see below)).
Then they threw me out, of their house, shop and office, In the process stealing and looting all of my belongings (business and personal)
I was sleeping under the van, in the desert. My main meal became cactus pads and water, when I could find it.
Telling the probation all of this, she was very hostile toward me and made my life much worse. Another rotten person, that can carry a gun and has authority.
I took several jobs with plumbing contractors. The best one only lasted a month, she made me quit cause I was making plumbing wages, which were 3 times hers. I worked for 2 more plumbing companies. In the end they ended up screwing with wages and not paying for supplies that I would purchased with cash at home depot or suppliers.
I managed to get back to
32 - I was served 10 times while I was in arizona,
Then I find out that when I was in
This "crap" was 1 of 3 legal matters that were going all at the same time. Apparently, the yellow book phone directory was suing me. During the sales meeting that led to this mess, I apparently signed for 2 phone book advertising areas each one was about $3,500 ($3,500 x 2 = $7,000).
The one phone book, I wanted.
The other I didn't (why would I travel 50 miles for a free estimate? How could I spend 3 hours travel time - 2 hour on the job (lets say rod out a sink line for set price) be competitive and make money, I just can't. So what we agreed to is that I would sign this other contract (for the simplicity if I chose to go this rout the sales man would have all documentation. I was to be a no go unless I called. I never called to proceed with the this second book. He never called me. I paid the first book in full. I paid only 2 payments on the not wanted (disputed) directory (I figured I will take most (2/3) responsibility, they should take 1/3) I told the in-house collection about this, they said no, no, no. Sued me. They got a default judgment on be (this conviction/probation in Scotillo's, was worse than jail), I tried to handle all these attacks at the same time as best as I could) The yellow book lawyer garnished my bank account that was used to pay the previous yellow book payments. They got $74 and the bank charged me $150 (which I did not have, even if I did, why would I refund that account) and closed the account.
I had a accountant, lawyer, who made a phone call to the attorneys representing yellow book, trying to make some type of deal, so I could settle. They said no.
My probation was transferred to Arizona. Apparently I was served with warrants 10 times, by process servers (cops making more money on the side) from the Rolling Meadows Court house. I come back and I was served another time.
I went to court, I wanted to tell the judge about the corruption of the yellow book attorney, court deception etc. but nobody would let me. I wanted to bring up the penalties for false serving, which for one, could be dismissal of the suite (if I read that right).
I told the yellow book lawyer I had a bank account in Arizona, balance about $23, I got this company that owes me $23,000. prior to Arizona. She did not care about this also, just wanted a couple pounds of my flesh.
I guess i have arrest warrant for me on this "crap".
4 years now, no income, I don't even file tax documents, IRS put tax liens against me as soon as I was un able to pay past tax bill payments.
I have see this all to many times, a Judge is going to order me to pay, I have no means to pay, now I am in contempt of court, a judge once said to me, come tomorrow with your tax returns or your going to jail (re previous tax matters from the Carter years... I just went underground and no longer filed tax documents for 15 years (see that story on my welcome blog))
33 - 3 out of 3 and 100% corruption
Now lets go into another crap trial. About the same time as these other 2 cases were beating me up, I had a third. In McHenry county. I hit a gas line year or so earlier, and they were suing me. Well on that case, figuring lawyers were honest (another mistake), the lawyers for the gas company would show evidence of the damage gas line and the locations markers. I was in the clear, the markers were about 3-4 fee off. The state law provided protection from the contractor in such cases. The makers can only be with in a 3 foot margin of error (1.5 feet each side of the actual pipe, cable or line). I thought the judge would see this and there was no sense telling the judge what state law is, so I am in the clear with that.
I was found guilty by default, and a $3,000 judgment was awarded against me.
Now these people wanted what ever was left of me. I hired another lawyer... from McHenery (who I hired to go in front of Scotillo re;Arizona matter... so this would be defense lawyer 5) to try to settle with the gas company lawyer, he did, ended up taking the last of my money.
3 TRIALS (3 OUT OF 3) THAT'S 100% AND ALL FULL OF CORRUPTION
my take it or leave it check
How much damage and disgrace has Judge Scotillo,
the appellate, 1 retired supreme court justice, the local law bar a few states attorneys, a couple assistant states attorneys, a dozen or so lawyers, a couple villages, mayors, a couple village councils, have done to the communities and to who ever, in the past 5 years,
to praise, honor, encourage, perjury, corruption, false documentation, drug usage, intoxication, obstruction of justice? The cops have been laughing at Scotillo, and other judges, the criminal justice system for a long time.
Until this pleasure is taken away, it will continue, the idea of hope, a cop will tell the truth, just don't cut it any more.
This time counter is the start of of just one event, one trial, of Palatine Police Officer Wenrich's dirt and the start of "lets see how far this will go".
All during this time no body has seen a problem here, but me.
I did not put the drugs in Wenrich's hand or in his mouth, he was higher than a kit way before he pulled me over. The police report he typed is the evidence. The fact that the Hunter sat next to Wenrich for 2 hours and did not notice a thing, makes you wounder about what Hunter was on. Where was deputy police chief Haas (now police chief of Inverness) as this was going on, or the shift commander or the chief?
If Wenrcih would have said the sears tower is in the Bahama's, I guess after the appellate added praise, honored and ruled, I guess it would be the law.
The only way a cop could testify to this, especially after peer review, is if, the judge was greased or dumber than a stump.
Giving such behavior a green light, is not good, I think it's a disgrace.
I do not think this was the first and only arrest by Wenrich and Hunter of it's type.
to praise, honor, encourage, perjury, corruption, false documentation, drug usage, intoxication, obstruction of justice? The cops have been laughing at Scotillo, and other judges, the criminal justice system for a long time.
Until this pleasure is taken away, it will continue, the idea of hope, a cop will tell the truth, just don't cut it any more.
This time counter is the start of of just one event, one trial, of Palatine Police Officer Wenrich's dirt and the start of "lets see how far this will go".
All during this time no body has seen a problem here, but me.
I did not put the drugs in Wenrich's hand or in his mouth, he was higher than a kit way before he pulled me over. The police report he typed is the evidence. The fact that the Hunter sat next to Wenrich for 2 hours and did not notice a thing, makes you wounder about what Hunter was on. Where was deputy police chief Haas (now police chief of Inverness) as this was going on, or the shift commander or the chief?
If Wenrcih would have said the sears tower is in the Bahama's, I guess after the appellate added praise, honored and ruled, I guess it would be the law.
The only way a cop could testify to this, especially after peer review, is if, the judge was greased or dumber than a stump.
Giving such behavior a green light, is not good, I think it's a disgrace.
I do not think this was the first and only arrest by Wenrich and Hunter of it's type.
I you came this far, to the bottom of this page, you probably glimpsed at this blog on the way down, all of this just because no one told the truth, or wants to tell the truth. Some place on one of these blogs, I say that if the cop said he made a mistake in the report, he wants to correct it right now under oath,...... this matter would would have been dead in its tracks. All these people are so self righteous and up there high on the hog, they think they cannot do any thing wrong, that may be so in their mind and their comrades minds, but it still ain't right.
ain't this a crock of shit? ..... and for what? mortal pleasure? or the god power feels so good, I ain't letting go?
I'm going to bed. and when I wake up I hope I can do some good things.
ain't this a crock of shit? ..... and for what? mortal pleasure? or the god power feels so good, I ain't letting go?
I'm going to bed. and when I wake up I hope I can do some good things.
I have a dream
good things can happen, we will get back on track with morals and values, have respect and honor for one and another. We can win and defeat the powers within that corrupt.
I don't think we were born with any bias, but through our life, some place down the line we start to go one way or the other. Society starts going one way or another also. Things get out of control, no body know how to stop, change directions or turn around.
I think the bias is to the good side, no matter how bleak things get.
My blogs will be on some one's server for the rest of time. I hope to add at some point in my life, that authorities have taken control. If I have not, sometimes when things are so screwed up it takes a little more time than hoped for to straighten em out.
I don't think we were born with any bias, but through our life, some place down the line we start to go one way or the other. Society starts going one way or another also. Things get out of control, no body know how to stop, change directions or turn around.
I think the bias is to the good side, no matter how bleak things get.
My blogs will be on some one's server for the rest of time. I hope to add at some point in my life, that authorities have taken control. If I have not, sometimes when things are so screwed up it takes a little more time than hoped for to straighten em out.
e11
John J. Flood Bio & Jim McGough (Biography)
6304 N Francisco Av
Chicago. Il 60659
773-878-1002(tel)
6304 N Francisco Av
Chicago. Il 60659
773-878-1002(tel)
| BGA Report -- Part 1 Part 2 Part 3 Part 4 “Patent Malarkey”: Public Dishonesty and Deception
This document is not to be reproduced without the express written permission of the Better Government Association. Extra copies of the BGA reports are available for $10 upon request.
Preface:
Rosenthal went on in the article to elaborate on Bratcher’s points given at the press conference, attacking Channel 5’s Dave Savini. Rosenthal describes the merits of the Palatine Task Force and discredits the informants involved with Lead 80. “Aviles, along with many other people, talked to police about the case, but his �information’ was exhaustively investigated and was discredited. Aviles was not a �key informant’ and what he told police simply was not true.”
|
IPSN � 1997-2006 All Rights reserved. Not for republication on the internet without permission.
webmaster
under construction